Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 216

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Risk of Secondary Leukemia After a Solid Tumor in Childhood According to the Dose of Epipodophyllotoxins and Anthracyclines: A Case-Control Study by the Société Française d’Oncologie Pédiatrique

Le Deley, Marie-Cécile, Leblanc, Thierry, Shamsaldin, Akthar, Raquin, Marie-Anne, Lacour, Brigitte, Sommelet, Danièle, Chompret, Agnès, Cayuela, Jean-Michel, Bayle, Chantal, Bernheim, Alain, de Vathaire, Florent, Vassal, Gilles, Hill, Catherine·2003·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To estimate the risk of secondary leukemia as a function of the dose of epipodophyllotoxins and anthracyclines. Methods: We conducted a case-control study of the risk of secondary leukemia or myelodysplasia after a solid tumor in childhood within the Société Française d’Oncologie Pédiatrique, including 61 patients with leukemia matched with 196 controls. The characteristics of the first cancer, the patient’s family history of cancer, and the treatment (type, cumulative dose of chemotherapy, schedule of etoposide administration, and radiation dose delivered to active bone marrow) were compared in the two groups. Results: Only two factors were found to increase the risk of leukemia in multivariate analysis, namely, the type of the first tumor, with an excess risk in patients with Hodgkin’s disease (relative risk 6.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6 to 24) or osteosarcoma (relative risk 5; 95% CI, 1.3 to 19), and exposure to epipodophyllotoxins and anthracyclines. The risk of leukemia increased regularly with the cumulative dose of etoposide. In summary, patients who received between 1.2 and 6 g/m 2 of epipodophyllotoxins or more than 170 mg/m 2 of anthracyclines had a seven-fold higher risk (95% CI, 2.6 to 19) compared with patients who received lower doses or none of these drugs. The risk of leukemia in patients who received more than 6 g/m 2 of epipodophyllotoxins was multiplied by 197 (95% CI, 19 to 2,058). The risk of leukemia was not increased by exposure to alkylating agents or radiotherapy. Conclusion: Both epipodophyllotoxins and anthracyclines increase the risk of secondary leukemia. The current challenge is to minimize the mutagenic effects of these drugs by diminishing cumulative doses without losing the therapeutic benefits.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2003.04.100

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 216

Metadata

Authors
Le Deley, M.-C., Leblanc, T., Shamsaldin, A., Raquin, M.-A., Lacour, B., Sommelet, D., Chompret, A., Cayuela, J.-M., Bayle, C., Bernheim, A., de Vathaire, F., Vassal, G., & Hill, C.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2003-03-15
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
1074-1081
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2120321741
Cited by
216
References
0
FWCI
9.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk of Secondary Leukemia After a Solid Tumor in Childhood According to the Dose of Epipodophyllotoxins and Anthracyclines: A Case-Control Study by the Société Française d’Oncologie Pédiatrique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2003.04.100
The paper
Le Deley, M.-C., Leblanc, T., Shamsaldin, A., Raquin, M.-A., Lacour, B., Sommelet, D., Chompret, A., Cayuela, J.-M., Bayle, C., Bernheim, A., de Vathaire, F., Vassal, G., & Hill, C. (2003). Risk of Secondary Leukemia After a Solid Tumor in Childhood According to the Dose of Epipodophyllotoxins and Anthracyclines: A Case-Control Study by the Société Française d’Oncologie Pédiatrique. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.04.100

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.