The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer Today—A Homogeneous Series Without Neoadjuvant Therapy
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the effect of pelvic lymph node dissection and radical cystectomy for transitional cell cancer of the bladder on recurrence-free and overall survival, pelvic recurrences, and metastatic patterns in a homogeneous group. Patients and Methods: A consecutive series of patients undergoing pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical cystectomy between 1985 and 2000 was analyzed. All patients were staged N0, M0 preoperatively, and no patient received neoadjuvant radio/chemotherapy. Pathologic characteristics based on the 1997 tumor-node-metastasis system, recurrence-free/overall survival, and metastatic patterns were determined. Results: Five hundred seven patients (age 66 ± 12 years) with a mean follow-up time of 45 months (range, 0.1 to 176 months) were analyzed. Five-year recurrence-free and overall survival were, respectively, 73% and 62% for patients with organ-confined, lymph node-negative tumors (n = 217; ≤ pT2, pN0) and 56% and 49% for non-organ-confined, lymph node-negative tumors (n = 166; > pT2, pN0). Positive lymph nodes were found in 124 (24%) patients who had a 5-year recurrence-free (33%) or overall (26%) survival. Isolated local recurrences were observed in 3% of patients with organ-confined tumors (≤ pT2, pN0), 11% with non-organ-confined tumors (> pT2, pN0), and 13% with positive lymph nodes (any pT, pN+). Distant metastases developed in 25% of patients with organ-confined tumors, 37% with non-organ-confined tumors, and 51% with positive lymph nodes. Conclusion: Despite negative preoperative staging, pelvic lymphadenectomy and cystectomy for bladder cancer reveal a high percentage of unsuspected nodal metastases (24%) that have a 25% chance for long-term survival. This procedure also ensures a low pelvic recurrence rate even in lymph node-positive patients, and patients with locally advanced cancer have a 56% probability of 5-year recurrence-free survival.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Inman, B. A., Sebo, T. J., Frigola, X., Dong, H., Bergstralh, E. J., Frank, I., Fradet, Y., Lacombe, L., & Kwon, E. D. (2007) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.22588 · Cited by 438
Efstathiou, J. A., Spiegel, D. Y., Shipley, W. U., Heney, N. M., Kaufman, D. S., Niemierko, A., Coen, J. J., Skowronski, R. Y., Paly, J. J., McGovern, F. J., et al. (2012) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.11.010 · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Authors
- Madersbacher, S., Hochreiter, W., Burkhard, F., Thalmann, G. N., Danuser, H., Markwalder, R., & Studer, U. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2003-02-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 690-696
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2022503705
- Cited by
- 763
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer Today—A Homogeneous Series Without Neoadjuvant Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2003.05.101
- The paper
- Madersbacher, S., Hochreiter, W., Burkhard, F., Thalmann, G. N., Danuser, H., Markwalder, R., & Studer, U. E. (2003). Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer Today—A Homogeneous Series Without Neoadjuvant Therapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.05.101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.