Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 353

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Results of a Randomized Study of Preradiation Chemotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone for Nonmetastatic Medulloblastoma: The International Society of Paediatric Oncology/United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group PNET-3 Study

Taylor, Roger E., Bailey, Clifford C., Robinson, Kath, Weston, Claire L., Ellison, David, Ironside, James, Lucraft, Helen, Gilbertson, Richard, Tait, Diana M., Walker, David A., Pizer, Barry L., Imeson, John, Lashford, Linda S.·2003·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether preradiotherapy (RT) chemotherapy would improve outcome for Chang stage M0–1 medulloblastoma when compared with RT alone. Chemotherapy comprised vincristine 1.5 mg/m 2 weekly for 10 weeks and four cycles of etoposide 100 mg/m 2 daily for 3 days, and carboplatin 500 mg/m 2 daily for 2 days alternating with cyclophosphamide 1.5 g/m 2. Patients and Methods: Patients aged 3 to 16 years inclusive were randomly assigned to receive 35 Gy craniospinal RT with a 20 Gy posterior fossa boost, or chemotherapy followed by RT. Results: Of 217 patients randomly assigned to treatment, 179 were eligible for analysis (chemotherapy + RT, 90 patients; RT alone, 89 patients). Median age was 7.67 years, and median follow-up was 5.40 years. Overall survival (OS) at 3 and 5 years was 79.5% and 70.7%, respectively. Event-free survival (EFS) at 3 and 5 years was 71.6% and 67.0%, respectively. EFS was significantly better for chemotherapy and RT (P = .0366), with EFS of 78.5% at 3 years and 74.2% at 5 years compared with 64.8% at 3 years and 59.8% at 5 years for RT alone. There was no statistically significant difference in 3-year and 5-year OS between the two arms (P = .0928). Multivariate analysis identified use of chemotherapy (P = .0248) and time to complete RT (P = .0100) as having significant effect on EFS. Conclusion: This is the first large multicenter randomized study to demonstrate improved EFS for chemotherapy compared with RT alone. It is anticipated that this regimen could reduce ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity compared with cisplatin-containing schedules. The importance of avoiding interruptions to RT has been confirmed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2003.05.116

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 353

Metadata

Authors
Taylor, R. E., Bailey, C. C., Robinson, K., Weston, C. L., Ellison, D., Ironside, J., Lucraft, H., Gilbertson, R., Tait, D. M., Walker, D. A., Pizer, B. L., Imeson, J., & Lashford, L. S.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2003-04-15
Volume
21
Issue
8
Pages
1581-1591
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2163101559
Cited by
353
References
0
FWCI
10.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Results of a Randomized Study of Preradiation Chemotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone for Nonmetastatic Medulloblastoma: The International Society of Paediatric Oncology/United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group PNET-3 Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2003.05.116
The paper
Taylor, R. E., Bailey, C. C., Robinson, K., Weston, C. L., Ellison, D., Ironside, J., Lucraft, H., Gilbertson, R., Tait, D. M., Walker, D. A., Pizer, B. L., Imeson, J., & Lashford, L. S. (2003). Results of a Randomized Study of Preradiation Chemotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone for Nonmetastatic Medulloblastoma: The International Society of Paediatric Oncology/United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group PNET-3 Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.05.116

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.