The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High Response Rates and Lasting Remissions After Low-Dose Involved Field Radiotherapy in Indolent Lymphomas
Abstract
Purpose: To study the response rates and duration of response after low-dose (4 Gy) involved field radiotherapy (LD-IF-RT) in patients with recurrent indolent lymphoma. Patients and Methods: A total of 109 assessable patients (304 symptomatic sites) were irradiated (53 males and 56 females; median age, 62 years; range, 35 to 93), including 98 patients with follicular lymphoma (43 grade 1 and 55 grade 2), nine extranodal marginal zone lymphomas of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue-type and two patients with lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma. Bulky disease (≥5 cm) was present in 52% of all patients. A median of two prior regimens (range, 0 to 11) preceded LD-IF-RT. The median time since diagnosis was 41 months (range, 2 to 358 months). Time to (local) progression was calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in response rates between treatments within the same patient were compared using the McNemar test. Results: The overall response rate was 92%; complete response was reached in 67 patients (61%), partial response in 34 patients (31%), stable disease in six patients (6%), and progressive disease in two patients (2%). The median time to progression was 14 months. The median time to local progression was 25 months. The 67 patients with complete response showed a median time to progression of 25 months and a median time to local progression of 42 months. None of the factors studied (age, sex, follicular lymphoma grade, radiotherapy regimen, number of previous regimens and previous history, number of positive sites or largest lymphoma diameter) were found to be related to response rate. Conclusion: LD-IF-RT is a valuable asset in the management of patients with follicular lymphoma and should be considered in patients with recurrent disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reduced dose radiotherapy for local control in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A randomised phase III trial
Lowry, L., Smith, P., Qian, W., Falk, S., Benstead, K., Illidge, T., Linch, D., Robinson, M., Jack, A., & Hoskin, P. (2011) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.013 · Cited by 386
Anceschi, C., Scavone, F., Armanetti, P., Menichetti, L., Catarinicchia, C., Borri, C., Ratto, F., Micheletti, F., Formica, N., Ruzzolini, J., et al. (2025) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202502416 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Haas, R. L. M., Poortmans, P., de Jong, D., Aleman, B. M. P., Dewit, L. G. H., Verheij, M., Hart, A. A. M., van Oers, M. H. J., van der Hulst, M., Baars, J. W., & Bartelink, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2003-07-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 2474-2480
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2146595682
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High Response Rates and Lasting Remissions After Low-Dose Involved Field Radiotherapy in Indolent Lymphomas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2003.09.542
- The paper
- Haas, R. L. M., Poortmans, P., de Jong, D., Aleman, B. M. P., Dewit, L. G. H., Verheij, M., Hart, A. A. M., van Oers, M. H. J., van der Hulst, M., Baars, J. W., & Bartelink, H. (2003). High Response Rates and Lasting Remissions After Low-Dose Involved Field Radiotherapy in Indolent Lymphomas. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.09.542
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.