Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 487

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized Comparison of ABVD and MOPP/ABV Hybrid for the Treatment of Advanced Hodgkin’s Disease: Report of an Intergroup Trial

Duggan, David B., Petroni, Gina R., Johnson, Jeffrey L., Glick, John H., Fisher, Richard I., Connors, Joseph M., Canellos, George P., Peterson, Bruce A.·2003·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: In a series of trials, doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) and mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone, doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vinblastine (MOPP/ABV) have been identified as effective treatments for Hodgkin’s disease. We compared these regimens as initial chemotherapy for Hodgkin’s disease. Patients and Methods: Adult patients (N = 856) with advanced Hodgkin’s disease were randomly assigned to treatment with ABVD or MOPP/ABV. The major end points were failure-free and overall survival, life-threatening acute toxicities, and serious long-term toxicities, including cardiomyopathy, pulmonary toxicity, myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and secondary malignancies. Results: The rates of complete remission (76% v 80%, P = .16), failure-free survival at 5 years (63% v 66%, P = .42), and overall survival at 5 years (82% v 81%, P = .82) were similar for ABVD and MOPP/ABV, respectively. Clinically significant acute pulmonary and hematologic toxicity were more common with MOPP/ABV (P = .060 and .001, respectively). There was no difference in cardiac toxicity. There were 24 deaths attributed to initial treatment: nine with ABVD and 15 with MOPP/ABV (P = .057). There have been 18 second malignancies associated with ABVD and 28 associated with MOPP/ABV (P = .13). Thirteen patients have developed MDS or acute leukemia: 11 were initially treated with MOPP/ABV, and two were initially treated with ABVD but subsequently received MOPP-containing regimens and radiotherapy before developing leukemia (P = .011). Conclusion: ABVD and the MOPP/ABV hybrid are effective therapies for Hodgkin’s disease. MOPP/ABV is associated with a greater incidence of acute toxicity, MDS, and leukemia. ABVD should be considered the standard regimen for treatment of advanced Hodgkin’s disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2003.12.086

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 487

Metadata

Authors
Duggan, D. B., Petroni, G. R., Johnson, J. L., Glick, J. H., Fisher, R. I., Connors, J. M., Canellos, G. P., & Peterson, B. A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2003-02-15
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
607-614
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2076334524
Cited by
487
References
1
FWCI
19.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Comparison of ABVD and MOPP/ABV Hybrid for the Treatment of Advanced Hodgkin’s Disease: Report of an Intergroup Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2003.12.086
The paper
Duggan, D. B., Petroni, G. R., Johnson, J. L., Glick, J. H., Fisher, R. I., Connors, J. M., Canellos, G. P., & Peterson, B. A. (2003). Randomized Comparison of ABVD and MOPP/ABV Hybrid for the Treatment of Advanced Hodgkin’s Disease: Report of an Intergroup Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.12.086

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.