The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phase I Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of Recombinant Human Endostatin in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
Abstract
Purpose: Endostatin is the first endogenous angiogenesis inhibitor to enter clinical trials. Laboratory investigations with endostatin have indicated broad antitumor activity coupled with remarkably low toxicity. A phase I trial of recombinant human endostatin was designed to evaluate toxicity and explore biologic effectiveness in patients with refractory solid tumors. Patients and Methods: Endostatin was administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion given daily for a 28-day cycle. A starting dose of 30 mg/m 2 was explored with subsequent dose escalations of 60, 100, 150, 225, and 300 mg/m 2. Assessment of serum pharmacokinetics was performed on all 21 patients. Western blot assay and mass spectroscopy were employed to evaluate endostatin metabolism. Circulating levels of endogenous proangiogenic growth factors were examined. Tumor and tumor blood supply were imaged by dynamic computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, and positron emission tomography. Results: Endostatin given on this schedule was essentially free of significant drug-related toxicity. Two transient episodes of grade 1 rash were observed. No clinical responses were observed. Endostatin pharmacokinetics were linear with dose, and serum concentrations were achieved that are associated with antitumor activity in preclinical models. No aggregate effect on circulating proangiogenic growth factors were seen, although several patients exhibited persistent declines in vascular endothelial growth factor levels while enrolled in the study. A few patients demonstrated changes in their dynamic CT scans suggestive of a decline in microvessel density, although overall, no consistent effect of endostatin on tumor vasculature was seen. Conclusion: Endostatin given daily as a 1-hour intravenous infusion was well tolerated without dose-limiting toxicity at doses up to 300 mg/m 2.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Endostatin: an endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis and tumor growth
O'Reilly, M. S., Boehm, T., Shing, Y., Fukai, N., Vasios, G., Lane, W. S., Flynn, E., Birkhead, J. R., Olsen, B. R., & Folkman, J. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81848-6 · Cited by 4,486
Antiangiogenic therapy of experimental cancer does not induce acquired drug resistance
Boehm, T., Folkman, J., Browder, T., & O'Reilly, M. S. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/37126 · Cited by 1,683
Cited by
Imaging of angiogenesis: from microscope to clinic
McDonald, D. M., & Choyke, P. L. (2003) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0603-713 · Cited by 1,016
Scappaticci, F. A., Fehrenbacher, L., Cartwright, T., Hainsworth, J. D., Heim, W., Berlin, J., Kabbinavar, F., Novotny, W., Sarkar, S., & Hurwitz, H. (2005) · Journal of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1002/jso.20301 · Cited by 537
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, J. P., Arzoomanian, R. Z., Alberti, D., Marnocha, R., Lee, F., Friedl, A., Tutsch, K., Dresen, A., Geiger, P., Pluda, J., Fogler, W., Schiller, J. H., & Wilding, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2003-01-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 223-231
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2151619744
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase I Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of Recombinant Human Endostatin in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2003.12.120
- The paper
- Thomas, J. P., Arzoomanian, R. Z., Alberti, D., Marnocha, R., Lee, F., Friedl, A., Tutsch, K., Dresen, A., Geiger, P., Pluda, J., Fogler, W., Schiller, J. H., & Wilding, G. (2003). Phase I Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of Recombinant Human Endostatin in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.12.120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.