Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical Nature and Prognosis of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer After Total Mesorectal Excision With or Without Preoperative Radiotherapy

van den Brink, Mandy, Stiggelbout, Anne M., van den Hout, Wilbert B., Kievit, Job, Klein Kranenbarg, Elma, Marijnen, Corrie A.M., Nagtegaal, Iris D., Rutten, Harm J.T., Wiggers, Theo, van de Velde, Cornelis J.H.·2004·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To document the clinical nature and prognosis of locally recurrent rectal cancer after total mesorectal excision (TME) with or without 5 × 5 Gy preoperative radiotherapy (PRT) and to identify patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors associated with differences in prognosis after local recurrence. Patients and Methods: For 96 Dutch patients with a local recurrence who participated in a multicenter randomized clinical trial, data on treatments and follow-up were gathered from surgeons and radiation and medical oncologists. Twenty-three patients (24%) had previously been treated with PRT plus TME, and 73 patients (76%) had been treated with TME alone. Eighty-one patients (84%) were followed until death; median follow-up time of the alive patients after local recurrence was 21 months (range, 5 to 48 months). Results: Survival after local recurrence in the PRT + TME group was significantly shorter than in the TME group (median survival, 6.1 v 15.9 months; hazard ratio for death, 2.1; P = .008). Patients with a local recurrence in the PRT + TME group had distant metastases more often (74% v 40%; P = .004), underwent surgical resection of local recurrence less often (17% v 35%; P = .11), and received radiotherapy for local recurrence at a total dose ≥ 45 Gy less often (4% v 42%; P = .001) than patients without PRT. In a multivariate analysis, the difference in survival after local recurrence between randomization groups was no longer statistically significant (hazard ratio for death of PRT, 1.53; P = .16). Conclusion: The clinical nature and prognosis of patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer has changed since the introduction of PRT. The majority of patients who present with a local recurrence after previous PRT have simultaneous distant metastases, and median survival has decreased to 6 months.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2004.01.023

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Metadata

Authors
van den Brink, M., Stiggelbout, A. M., van den Hout, W. B., Kievit, J., Klein Kranenbarg, E., Marijnen, C. A. M., Nagtegaal, I. D., Rutten, H. J. T., Wiggers, T., & van de Velde, C. J. H.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2004-10-01
Volume
22
Issue
19
Pages
3958-3964
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2097719906
Cited by
167
References
1
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Nature and Prognosis of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer After Total Mesorectal Excision With or Without Preoperative Radiotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2004.01.023
The paper
van den Brink, M., Stiggelbout, A. M., van den Hout, W. B., Kievit, J., Klein Kranenbarg, E., Marijnen, C. A. M., Nagtegaal, I. D., Rutten, H. J. T., Wiggers, T., & van de Velde, C. J. H. (2004). Clinical Nature and Prognosis of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer After Total Mesorectal Excision With or Without Preoperative Radiotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.01.023

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.