The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phase III Trial of Doxorubicin With or Without Cisplatin in Advanced Endometrial Carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
Abstract
Purpose: Doxorubicin and cisplatin have activity in endometrial carcinoma and at initiation of this study ranked as the most active agents. This trial of stage III, IV, or recurrent disease evaluated whether combining these agents increases response rate (RR) and prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) over doxorubicin alone. Patients and Methods: Of 299 patients registered, 281 (94%) were eligible. Regimens were doxorubicin 60 mg/m 2 intravenously or doxorubicin 60 mg/m 2 plus cisplatin 50 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a total of 500 mg/m 2 doxorubicin. Results: There were 12 (8%) complete (CR) and 26 (17%) partial responses (PR) among 150 patients receiving doxorubicin versus 25 (19%) CRs and 30 (23%) PRs among patients receiving the combination. The overall response rate was higher among patients receiving the combination (42%) compared with patients receiving doxorubicin (25%; P = .004). Median PFS was 5.7 and 3.8 months, respectively, for the combination and single agent. The PFS hazard ratio was 0.736 (95% CI, 0.577 to 0.939; P = .014). Median OS was 9.0 and 9.2 months, respectively, for the combination and single agent. Overall death rates were similar in the two groups (hazard ratio, 0.928; 95% CI, 0.727 to 1.185). Nausea, vomiting, and hematologic toxicities were common. The combination produced more grade 3 to 4 leukopenia (62% v 40%), thrombocytopenia (14% v 2%), anemia (22% v 4%), and nausea/vomiting (13% v 3%). Conclusion: Adding cisplatin to doxorubicin in advanced endometrial carcinoma improves RR and PFS with a negligible impact on OS and produces increased toxicity. These results have served as a building block for subsequent phase III trials in patients with disseminated and high-risk limited endometrial carcinoma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Aggregation-Induced Emission: Together We Shine, United We Soar!
Mei, J., Leung, N. L. C., Kwok, R. T. K., Lam, J. W. Y., & Tang, B. Z. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00263 · Cited by 8,270
Randall, M. E., Filiaci, V. L., Muss, H., Spirtos, N. M., Mannel, R. S., Fowler, J., Thigpen, J. T., & Benda, J. A. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.00.7617 · Cited by 872
Self-citationSpecific light-up bioprobes based on AIEgen conjugates
Liang, J., Tang, B. Z., & Liu, B. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00444b · Cited by 762
Endometrial cancer: A review and current management strategies: Part II
Burke, W. M., Orr, J., Leitao, M., Salom, E., Gehrig, P., Olawaiye, A. B., Brewer, M., Boruta, D., Herzog, T. J., & Shahin, F. A. (2014) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.06.003 · Cited by 459
Abraha, I., Cherubini, A., Cozzolino, F., De Florio, R., Luchetta, M. L., Rimland, J. M., Folletti, I., Marchesi, M., Germani, A., Orso, M., et al. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.h2445 · Cited by 165
Metadata
- Authors
- Thigpen, J. T., Brady, M. F., Homesley, H. D., Malfetano, J., DuBeshter, B., Burger, R. A., & Liao, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2004-10-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 3902-3908
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2120965358
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase III Trial of Doxorubicin With or Without Cisplatin in Advanced Endometrial Carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2004.02.088
- The paper
- Thigpen, J. T., Brady, M. F., Homesley, H. D., Malfetano, J., DuBeshter, B., Burger, R. A., & Liao, S. (2004). Phase III Trial of Doxorubicin With or Without Cisplatin in Advanced Endometrial Carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.02.088
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.