The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Randomized Phase III Trial of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Versus Vinorelbine or Mitomycin C Plus Vinblastine in Women With Taxane-Refractory Advanced Breast Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: To compare the efficacy of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) with that of a common salvage regimen (comparator) in patients with taxane-refractory advanced breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Following failure of a first- or second-line taxane-containing regimen for metastatic disease, 301 women were randomly assigned to receive PLD (50 mg/m 2 every 28 days); or comparator-vinorelbine (30 mg/m 2 weekly) or mitomycin C (10 mg/m 2 day 1 and every 28 days) plus vinblastine (5 mg/m 2 day 1, day 14, day 28, and day 42) every 6 to 8 weeks. Patients were stratified before random assignment based on number of previous chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease and presence of bone metastases only. Results: Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar for PLD and comparator (PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 1.26; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.62; P = .11; median, 2.9 months [PLD] and 2.5 months [comparator]; OS: HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.33; P = .71; median, 11.0 months [PLD] and 9.0 months [comparator]). In anthracycline-naïve patients, PFS was somewhat longer with PLD, relative to the comparator (n = 44; median PFS, 5.8 v 2.1 months; HR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.16 to 4.95; P = .01). Most frequently reported adverse events were nausea (23% to 31%), vomiting (17% to 20%), and fatigue (9% to 20%) and were similar among treatment groups. PLD-treated patients experienced more palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (37%; 18% grade 3, 1 patient grade 4) and stomatitis (22%; 5% grades 3/4). Neuropathy (11%), constipation (16%), and neutropenia (14%) were more common with vinorelbine. Alopecia was low in both the PLD and vinorelbine groups (3% and 5%). Conclusion: PLD has efficacy comparable to that of common salvage regimens in patients with taxane-refractory metastatic breast cancer, thereby representing a useful therapeutic option.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Smart micro/nanoparticles in stimulus-responsive drug/gene delivery systems
Karimi, M., Ghasemi, A., Sahandi Zangabad, P., Rahighi, R., Moosavi Basri, S. M., Mirshekari, H., Amiri, M., Shafaei Pishabad, Z., Aslani, A., Bozorgomid, M., et al. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00798d · Cited by 1,519
Clinical Translation of Nanomedicine
Min, Y., Caster, J. M., Eblan, M. J., & Wang, A. Z. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00116 · Cited by 772
Targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in triple-negative breast cancer: a review
Costa, R. L. B., Han, H. S., & Gradishar, W. J. (2018) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-018-4697-y · Cited by 439
Duggan, S. T., & Keating, G. M. (2011) · Drugs · doi:10.2165/11207510-000000000-00000 · Cited by 234
Andreopoulou, E., & Sparano, J. A. (2013) · Current Breast Cancer Reports · doi:10.1007/s12609-012-0097-1 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Keller, A. M., Mennel, R. G., Georgoulias, V. A., Nabholtz, J.-M., Erazo, A., Lluch, A., Vogel, C. L., Kaufmann, M., von Minckwitz, G., Henderson, I. C., Mellars, L., Alland, L., & Tendler, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2004-10-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 3893-3901
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2157470118
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Phase III Trial of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Versus Vinorelbine or Mitomycin C Plus Vinblastine in Women With Taxane-Refractory Advanced Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2004.08.157
- The paper
- Keller, A. M., Mennel, R. G., Georgoulias, V. A., Nabholtz, J.-M., Erazo, A., Lluch, A., Vogel, C. L., Kaufmann, M., von Minckwitz, G., Henderson, I. C., Mellars, L., Alland, L., & Tendler, C. (2004). Randomized Phase III Trial of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Versus Vinorelbine or Mitomycin C Plus Vinblastine in Women With Taxane-Refractory Advanced Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.08.157
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.