The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Results of Whole-Brain Radiation As Salvage of Methotrexate Failure for Immunocompetent Patients With Primary CNS Lymphoma
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluates the efficacy and toxicity of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) as salvage therapy for immunocompetent patients who failed initial high-dose methotrexate for primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL). Patients and Methods: The study cohort included 27 consecutive patients who failed initial high-dose methotrexate and then received salvage WBRT (median dose, 36 Gy). Actuarial survival was measured from the initiation of radiotherapy. Results: Ten patients (37%) achieved a complete radiographic response (CR), and 10 patients (37%) a partial response to WBRT, for a 74% overall radiographic response rate. At the time of maximal response, Karnofsky performance status improved in 12 (44%) of 27 patients and at least stabilized in 67%. Median estimated survival from initiation of WBRT was 10.9 months (range, 0.3 to 63.7 months). The univariate predictor of longer survival was age less than 60 years at the time of WBRT (P = .028). Among patients who survived 4 months, achievement of a CR to WBRT by 4 months (P = .002) predicted longer survival. Late treatment-associated neurotoxicity was diagnosed in four patients (15%) and was significantly associated with total radiation doses greater than 36 Gy (P = .04). No patient treated with daily fractions less than 1.8 Gy developed late neurotoxicity. Conclusion: For patients with PCNSL who experience treatment failure with methotrexate, WBRT provides high response rates (74%) and a median survival of 10.9 months. Age less than 60 years and response to WBRT predict post-WBRT survival. Modest rates of late neurotoxicity (15%) were seen and were associated with a total dose greater than 36 Gy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma.
Macdonald, D. R., Cascino, T. L., Schold, S. C., & Cairncross, J. G. (1990) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1990.8.7.1277 · Cited by 2,409
Cited by
Nayak, L., Iwamoto, F. M., LaCasce, A., Mukundan, S., Roemer, M. G. M., Chapuy, B., Armand, P., Rodig, S. J., & Shipp, M. A. (2017) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2017-01-764209 · Cited by 453
Hoang-Xuan, K., Bessell, E., Bromberg, J., Hottinger, A. F., Preusser, M., Rudà, R., Schlegel, U., Siegal, T., Soussain, C., Abacioglu, U., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00076-5 · Cited by 411
Yahalom, J., Illidge, T., Specht, L., Hoppe, R. T., Li, Y.-X., Tsang, R., & Wirth, A. (2015) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.01.009 · Cited by 405
Batchelor, T., & Loeffler, J. S. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.04.8819 · Cited by 362
Self-citationSoussain, C., Hoang-Xuan, K., Taillandier, L., Fourme, E., Choquet, S., Witz, F., Casasnovas, O., Dupriez, B., Souleau, B., Taksin, A.-L., et al. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.13.5533 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Nguyen, P. L., Chakravarti, A., Finkelstein, D. M., Hochberg, F. H., Batchelor, T. T., & Loeffler, J. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2005-03-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1507-1513
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2137578993
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Results of Whole-Brain Radiation As Salvage of Methotrexate Failure for Immunocompetent Patients With Primary CNS Lymphoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.01.161
- The paper
- Nguyen, P. L., Chakravarti, A., Finkelstein, D. M., Hochberg, F. H., Batchelor, T. T., & Loeffler, J. S. (2005). Results of Whole-Brain Radiation As Salvage of Methotrexate Failure for Immunocompetent Patients With Primary CNS Lymphoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.01.161
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.