The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Variates of Survival in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The course and outcome of metastatic uveal melanoma are not well described. We evaluated the survival of our patients with metastatic uveal melanoma, described factors that correlated with survival, and evaluated the influence of screening tests on time of detection and survival. Patients and Methods: All patients with metastatic uveal melanoma seen at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between 1994 and 2004 were identified from our database. We recorded date of initial diagnosis, date of metastatic disease, date of last follow-up, site of the first metastasis, how the first metastasis was discovered, treatment, and outcome of therapy. Results: The estimated median survival of the 119 patients analyzed was 12.5 months; 22% of patients were alive at 4 years. Five variates correlated independently with prolonged survival: Lung/soft tissue as only site of first metastasis, treatment with surgery or intrahepatic therapy, female sex, age younger than 60, and a longer interval from initial diagnosis to metastatic disease. Discovering metastatic disease in asymptomatic patients did not correlate with overall survival; 89% of patients had a single organ as the site of first metastasis. Although liver was the most common site, 39.5% of patients had nonliver sites, most commonly lung, as the first site of metastasis. Conclusion: A substantial subset of patients with metastatic uveal melanoma survive more than 4 years with metastatic disease. Data on variates of survival and site of first metastasis may guide strategies for screening patients, although our data failed to show a survival advantage in discovering asymptomatic metastatic disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of survival by tumor response.
Anderson, J. R., Cain, K. C., & Gelber, R. D. (1983) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1983.1.11.710 · Cited by 1,107
Analysis of survival by tumor response.
Anderson, J. R., & Davis, R. B. (1986) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1986.4.1.115 · Cited by 1,000
Onken, M. D., Worley, L. A., Ehlers, J. P., & Harbour, J. W. (2004) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-1750 · Cited by 750
Survival of Patents with Metastases from Uveal Melanoma
Gragoudas, E. S., Egan, K. M., Seddon, J. M., Glynn, R. J., Walsh, S. M., Finn, S. M., Munzenrider, J. E., & Spar, M. D. (1991) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32285-1 · Cited by 368
Alexander, H. R., Libutti, S. K., Bartlett, D. L., Puhlmann, M., Fraker, D. L., & Bachenheimer, L. C. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 140
Cited by
Effectiveness of Treatments for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma
Augsburger, J. J., Corrêa, Z. M., & Shaikh, A. H. (2009) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.01.023 · Cited by 288
BRAF V600E-dependent role of autophagy in uveal melanoma
Zhao, Y., Wang, W., Min, I., Wyrwas, B., Moore, M., Zarnegar, R., & Fahey, T. J. (2017) · Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s00432-016-2317-y · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Rietschel, P., Panageas, K. S., Hanlon, C., Patel, A., Abramson, D. H., & Chapman, P. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2005-11-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 31
- Pages
- 8076-8080
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2166771927
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variates of Survival in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.02.6534
- The paper
- Rietschel, P., Panageas, K. S., Hanlon, C., Patel, A., Abramson, D. H., & Chapman, P. B. (2005). Variates of Survival in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.02.6534
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.