Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 559

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Colorectal Cancer Surveillance: 2005 Update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology Practice Guideline

Open access
Desch, Christopher E., Benson, Al B., Somerfield, Mark R., Flynn, Patrick J., Krause, Carol, Loprinzi, Charles L., Minsky, Bruce D., Pfister, David G., Virgo, Katherine S., Petrelli, Nicholas J.·2005·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To update the 2000 American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline on colorectal cancer surveillance. Recommendations: Based on results from three independently reported meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials that compared low-intensity and high-intensity programs of colorectal cancer surveillance, and on recent analyses of data from major clinical trials in colon and rectal cancer, the Panel recommends annual computed tomography (CT) of the chest and abdomen for 3 years after primary therapy for patients who are at higher risk of recurrence and who could be candidates for curative-intent surgery; pelvic CT scan for rectal cancer surveillance, especially for patients with several poor prognostic factors, including those who have not been treated with radiation; colonoscopy at 3 years after operative treatment, and, if results are normal, every 5 years thereafter; flexible proctosigmoidoscopy every 6 months for 5 years for rectal cancer patients who have not been treated with pelvic radiation; history and physical examination every 3 to 6 months for the first 3 years, every 6 months during years 4 and 5, and subsequently at the discretion of the physician; and carcinoembryonic antigen every 3 months postoperatively for at least 3 years after diagnosis, if the patient is a candidate for surgery or systemic therapy. Chest x-rays, CBCs, and liver function tests are not recommended, and molecular or cellular markers should not influence the surveillance strategy based on available evidence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2005.04.0063

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 559

Metadata

Authors
Desch, C. E., Benson, A. B., Somerfield, M. R., Flynn, P. J., Krause, C., Loprinzi, C. L., Minsky, B. D., Pfister, D. G., Virgo, K. S., & Petrelli, N. J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2005-11-20
Volume
23
Issue
33
Pages
8512-8519
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2171910021
Cited by
559
References
2
FWCI
12.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Colorectal Cancer Surveillance: 2005 Update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology Practice Guideline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.04.0063
The paper
Desch, C. E., Benson, A. B., Somerfield, M. R., Flynn, P. J., Krause, C., Loprinzi, C. L., Minsky, B. D., Pfister, D. G., Virgo, K. S., & Petrelli, N. J. (2005). Colorectal Cancer Surveillance: 2005 Update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology Practice Guideline. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.04.0063

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.