Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 560

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized Trial of Hyperthermia and Radiation for Superficial Tumors

Jones, Ellen L., Oleson, James R., Prosnitz, Leonard R., Samulski, Thaddeus V., Vujaskovic, Zeljko, Yu, Daohai, Sanders, Linda L., Dewhirst, Mark W.·2005·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated hyperthermia (HT) enhances radiation response. These trials, however, generally lacked rigorous thermal dose prescription and administration. We report the final results of a prospective randomized trial of superficial tumors (≤ 3 cm depth) comparing radiotherapy versus HT combined with radiotherapy, using the parameter describing the number of cumulative equivalent minutes at 43°C exceeded by 90% of monitored points within the tumor (CEM 43°C T 90) as a measure of thermal dose. Methods: This trial was designed to test whether a thermal dose of more than 10 CEM 43°C T 90 results in improved complete response and duration of local control compared with a thermal dose of ≤ 1 CEM 43°C T 90. Patients received a test dose of HT ≤ 1 CEM 43°C T 90 and tumors deemed heatable were randomly assigned to additional HT versus no additional HT. HT was given using microwave spiral strip applicators operating at 433 MHz. Results: One hundred twenty-two patients were enrolled; 109 (89%) were deemed heatable and were randomly assigned. The complete response rate was 66.1% in the HT arm and 42.3% in the no-HT arm. The odds ratio for complete response was 2.7 (95% CI, 1.2 to 5.8; P = .02). Previously irradiated patients had the greatest incremental gain in complete response: 23.5% in the no-HT arm versus 68.2% in the HT arm. No overall survival benefit was seen. Conclusion: Adjuvant hyperthermia with a thermal dose more than 10 CEM 43°C T 90 confers a significant local control benefit in patients with superficial tumors receiving radiation therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2005.05.520

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 560

Metadata

Authors
Jones, E. L., Oleson, J. R., Prosnitz, L. R., Samulski, T. V., Vujaskovic, Z., Yu, D., Sanders, L. L., & Dewhirst, M. W.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2005-05-01
Volume
23
Issue
13
Pages
3079-3085
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2016204586
Cited by
560
References
16
FWCI
16.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Trial of Hyperthermia and Radiation for Superficial Tumors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.05.520
The paper
Jones, E. L., Oleson, J. R., Prosnitz, L. R., Samulski, T. V., Vujaskovic, Z., Yu, D., Sanders, L. L., & Dewhirst, M. W. (2005). Randomized Trial of Hyperthermia and Radiation for Superficial Tumors. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.05.520

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.