Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Meta-Analysis to Evaluate the Role of Interferon in Follicular Lymphoma

Open access
Rohatiner, A.Z.S., Gregory, W.M., Peterson, B., Borden, E., Solal-Celigny, P., Hagenbeek, A., Fisher, R.I., Unterhalt, M., Arranz, R., Chisesi, T., Aviles, A., Lister, T.A.·2005·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether interferon (IFN) -α2, when given with or following chemotherapy, influences response rate, remission duration, and survival in newly diagnosed patients with follicular lymphoma. Patients and Methods: Ten phase III studies evaluating the role of IFN-α2 in 1,922 newly diagnosed patients with follicular lymphoma were analyzed. Updated individual patient data were used to perform meta-analyses for response, survival, and remission duration. Results: The addition of IFN-α2 to initial chemotherapy did not significantly influence response rate. An overall meta-analysis for survival showed a significant difference in favor of IFN-α2, but also showed significant heterogeneity between studies. Further analyses were carried out in order to explain this heterogeneity, and to define the circumstances in which IFN-α2 prolonged survival. The survival advantage was seen when IFN-α2 was given: (1) in conjunction with relatively intensive initial chemotherapy (2P = .00005), (2) at a dose ≥ 5 million units (2P = .000002), (3) at a cumulative dose ≥ 36 million units per month (2P = .000008), and (4) with chemotherapy rather than as maintenance therapy (P = .004). With regard to remission duration, there was also a significant difference in favor of IFN-α2, irrespective of the intensity of chemotherapy used, IFN dose, or whether IFN was given as a maintenance strategy or with chemotherapy. Conclusion: When given in the context of relatively intensive initial chemotherapy, and at a dose ≥ 5 million units (≥ 36 × 10 6 units per month), IFN-α2 prolongs survival and remission duration in patients with follicular lymphoma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2005.06.146

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Rohatiner, A. Z. S., Gregory, W. M., Peterson, B., Borden, E., Solal-Celigny, P., Hagenbeek, A., Fisher, R. I., Unterhalt, M., Arranz, R., Chisesi, T., Aviles, A., & Lister, T. A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2005-04-01
Volume
23
Issue
10
Pages
2215-2223
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2126027842
Cited by
170
References
0
FWCI
16.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meta-Analysis to Evaluate the Role of Interferon in Follicular Lymphoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.06.146
The paper
Rohatiner, A. Z. S., Gregory, W. M., Peterson, B., Borden, E., Solal-Celigny, P., Hagenbeek, A., Fisher, R. I., Unterhalt, M., Arranz, R., Chisesi, T., Aviles, A., & Lister, T. A. (2005). Meta-Analysis to Evaluate the Role of Interferon in Follicular Lymphoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.06.146

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.