Effects of Exemestane Administered for 2 Years Versus Placebo on Bone Mineral Density, Bone Biomarkers, and Plasma Lipids in Patients With Surgically Resected Early Breast Cancer
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate potential detrimental effects of exemestane on bone and lipid metabolism. Patients and Methods: Postmenopausal women with early breast cancer were randomly assigned to exemestane 25 mg daily or placebo for 2 years in a double-blind setting. Primary objective was to evaluate the effect of exemestane on bone mineral density. Secondary objectives were effects on bone biomarkers, plasma lipids, coagulation factors, and homocysteine. Planned size was 128 patients. Results: One hundred forty-seven patients were enrolled. All patients completed their 24-month visit except for those discontinuing treatment at an earlier stage. The mean annual rate of bone mineral density loss was 2.17% v 1.84% in the lumbar spine (P = .568) and 2.72% v 1.48% in the femoral neck (P = .024) in the exemestane and placebo arm, respectively. The mean change in T-score after 2 years was −0.21 for exemestane and −0.11 on placebo in the hip, and −0.30 and −0.21, respectively, in the lumbar spine. Exemestane significantly increased serum level and urinary excretion of bone resorption, but also bone formation markers. Except for a modest reduction in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P < .001) and apolipoprotein A1 (P = .004), exemestane had no major effect on lipid profile, homocysteine levels, or coagulation parameters. Conclusion: Exemestane modestly enhanced bone loss from the femoral neck without significant influence on lumbar bone loss. Except for a 6% to 9% drop in plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, no major effects on serum lipids, coagulation factors, or homocysteine were recorded. Bone mineral density should be assessed according to the US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Aromatase inhibitors were proven to be safe, convenient and effective for the treatment of hormone sensitive breast cancer in women.
“Aromatase inhibitors were proven to be safe, convenient and effective for the treatment of hormone sensitive breast cancer in women although their use is associated with a modest increase in bone resorption [2,3].”
From Aromatase inhibitors in men: effects and therapeutic options (2011) · cites this paper as [2]
Aromatase inhibitors use in women is associated with a modest increase in bone resorption.
“Aromatase inhibitors were proven to be safe, convenient and effective for the treatment of hormone sensitive breast cancer in women although their use is associated with a modest increase in bone resorption [2,3].”
From Aromatase inhibitors in men: effects and therapeutic options (2011) · cites this paper as [2]
Long-term use of potent aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women is associated with adverse effects on bone.
“In postmenopausal women with breast carcinoma, long-term use of potent aromatase inhibitors reduces circulating estradiol levels by 88% [31] and is associated with adverse effects on bone [2,3].”
From Aromatase inhibitors in men: effects and therapeutic options (2011) · cites this paper as [2]
Long-term use in postmenopausal women is associated with a moderate increase in bone resorption and a modest decrease in BMD compared with placebo.
“Long-term use in postmenopausal women is associated with a moderate increase in bone resorption and a modest decrease in BMD compared with placebo [2,3].”
From Aromatase inhibitors in men: effects and therapeutic options (2011) · cites this paper as [2]
Extensive experience with third-generation aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women did not reveal major side effects related to their use.
“Extensive experience with third-generation aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women did not reveal major side effects related to their use.”
From Aromatase inhibitors in men: effects and therapeutic options (2011) · cites this paper as [2]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 54 · Cited by 295
- Authors
- Lønning, P. E., Geisler, J., Krag, L. E., Erikstein, B., Bremnes, Y., Hagen, A. I., Schlichting, E., Lien, E. A., Øfjord, E. S., Paolini, J., Polli, A., & Massimini, G.
- Affiliations
- University Hospital of North Norway (NO)
- From the Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital; Laboratory for Clinical Biochemistry, Haukeland University Hospital; Center for Clinical Trials, Bergen; Department of Surgery, Rogaland Central Hospital, Stavanger; Department of Oncology, The Norwegian Radiumhospital; Department of Surgery, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo; Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø; Department of Surgery, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; and Pharmacia...
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2005-08-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 5126-5137
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2168772783
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 36.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Pfizer
- American Society of Clinical Oncology
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
- Keywords
- exemestane, aromatase inhibitors, early breast cancer, bone mineral density, bone loss, bone resorption markers, bone formation markers, plasma lipids, HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-I, homocysteine, coagulation factors, postmenopausal women, femoral neck, lumbar spine, T-score
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Androstadienes, Bone Resorption, Breast Neoplasms, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Lipids, Middle Aged, Placebos, Bone Density, Postmenopause, Aromatase Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review