Prevalence and Causes of Fatigue After Cancer Treatment: The Next Generation of Research
Abstract
The presence of fatigue in cancer patients is now well documented. Fatigue is recognized as the most common and distressing side effect of cancer treatment, occurring among patients undergoing radiation, chemotherapy, and treatment with biologic response modifiers. Furthermore, there is evidence that fatigue may persist for months or years after completion of successful treatment in a substantial minority of patients. Qualitative reports indicate that cancer-related fatigue differs from normal fatigue related to lack of rest or overexertion as it involves more severe and enduring mental, physical, and emotional domains. As such, cancer-related fatigue has a particularly detrimental effect on quality of life. Although research on cancer-related fatigue has become increasingly sophisticated, few longitudinal studies have been conducted that assess patients before and after treatment completion. Clearly, knowledge of a patient’s status before treatment onset (and ideally, during treatment) is critical for an accurate understanding of posttreatment fatigue. The study by Nieboer et al in this issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology represents an important advance in this literature in its evaluation of breast cancer patients before and at yearly intervals after randomization to treatment with standardor high-dose chemotherapy. The study is also notable for the size of the sample (N 430) and the number of post-treatment assessments. The key findings from the study are as follows.…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Difference between cancer fatigue and normal fatigue: longer duration, less rest, heavier mental, physical, emotional domains.
“The difference between fatigue in cancer and normal fatigue lies in the duration of fatigue that lasts for a long time and causes less rest, involving a heavier mental, physical, and emotional domain [23].”
From Empowerment in the treatment of fatigue in breast cancer patients (2021) · cites this paper as [23]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 21 · Cited by 85
- Authors
- Bower, J. E.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bower, Julienne E.
- ORCID
- Bower, Julienne E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2005-11-20
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 33
- Pages
- 8280-8282
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2101834580
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
- Keywords
- cancer-related fatigue, breast cancer survivors, high-dose chemotherapy, standard-dose chemotherapy, radiotherapy, fatigue prevalence, fatigue recovery, mental health, muscle and joint pain, quality of life, treatment side effects, longitudinal follow-up, menopausal status, hemoglobin, biological response modifiers, fatigue etiology
- MeSH terms
- Antineoplastic Agents, Breast Neoplasms, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Quality of Life, United States, Prevalence, Biomedical Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review