Cited by 85Cancer survivorship and careCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Prevalence and Causes of Fatigue After Cancer Treatment: The Next Generation of Research

Bower, Julienne E.·2005·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

The presence of fatigue in cancer patients is now well documented. Fatigue is recognized as the most common and distressing side effect of cancer treatment, occurring among patients undergoing radiation, chemotherapy, and treatment with biologic response modifiers. Furthermore, there is evidence that fatigue may persist for months or years after completion of successful treatment in a substantial minority of patients. Qualitative reports indicate that cancer-related fatigue differs from normal fatigue related to lack of rest or overexertion as it involves more severe and enduring mental, physical, and emotional domains. As such, cancer-related fatigue has a particularly detrimental effect on quality of life. Although research on cancer-related fatigue has become increasingly sophisticated, few longitudinal studies have been conducted that assess patients before and after treatment completion. Clearly, knowledge of a patient’s status before treatment onset (and ideally, during treatment) is critical for an accurate understanding of posttreatment fatigue. The study by Nieboer et al in this issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology represents an important advance in this literature in its evaluation of breast cancer patients before and at yearly intervals after randomization to treatment with standardor high-dose chemotherapy. The study is also notable for the size of the sample (N 430) and the number of post-treatment assessments. The key findings from the study are as follows.…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2005.08.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Difference between cancer fatigue and normal fatigue: longer duration, less rest, heavier mental, physical, emotional domains.

    “The difference between fatigue in cancer and normal fatigue lies in the duration of fatigue that lasts for a long time and causes less rest, involving a heavier mental, physical, and emotional domain [23].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 21 · Cited by 85

Authors
Bower, J. E.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Bower, Julienne E.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2005-11-20
Volume
23
Issue
33
Pages
8280-8282
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2101834580
Cited by
85
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
cancer-related fatigue, breast cancer survivors, high-dose chemotherapy, standard-dose chemotherapy, radiotherapy, fatigue prevalence, fatigue recovery, mental health, muscle and joint pain, quality of life, treatment side effects, longitudinal follow-up, menopausal status, hemoglobin, biological response modifiers, fatigue etiology
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Breast Neoplasms, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Quality of Life, United States, Prevalence, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review