The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
End-of-Life Care Preferences of Pediatric Patients With Cancer
Abstract
Purpose: The viewpoint of the terminally ill child at the time of an end-of-life decision has not been formally investigated. We identified the preferences of children and adolescents with advanced cancer about their end-of-life care and the factors that influenced their decisions. Patients and Methods: Pediatric patients 10 or more years of age were interviewed within 7 days of participating in one of the following three end-of-life decisions: enrollment onto a phase I trial (n = 7), adoption of a do not resuscitate order (n = 5), or initiation of terminal care (n = 8). The patient, a parent, and the primary pediatric oncologist were interviewed separately by using open-ended interview questions. Results: Twenty patients, aged 10 to 20 years (mean, 17 years and 4 months), with a refractory solid tumor (n = 12), brain tumor (n = 4), or leukemia (n = 4) participated. Eighteen patients (90%) accurately recalled all of their treatment options and identified their own death as a consequence of their decision. The factors that were most frequently identified included the following: for patients, caring about others (n = 19 patients); for parents, the child's preferences (n = 18 parents); and for physicians, the patient's prognosis and comorbid conditions (n = 14 physicians). Conclusion: These children and adolescents with advanced cancer realized that they were involved in an end-of-life decision, understood the consequences of their decision, and were capable of participating in a complex decision process involving risks to themselves and others. The decision factors most frequently reported by patients were relationship based; this finding is contrary to existing developmental theories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hilden, J. M., Emanuel, E. J., Fairclough, D. L., Link, M. P., Foley, K. M., Clarridge, B. C., Schnipper, L. E., & Mayer, R. J. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2001.19.1.205 · Cited by 324
Cited by
Coyne, I., Amory, A., Kiernan, G., & Gibson, F. (2014) · European Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2014.01.006 · Cited by 324
Hinds, P. S., Oakes, L. L., Hicks, J., Powell, B., Srivastava, D. K., Spunt, S. L., Harper, J., Baker, J. N., West, N. K., & Furman, W. L. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.20.0204 · Cited by 286
Self-citationAllowing Adolescents and Young Adults to Plan Their End-of-Life Care
Wiener, L., Zadeh, S., Battles, H., Baird, K., Ballard, E., Osherow, J., & Pao, M. (2012) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2012-0663 · Cited by 233
Family-Centered Advance Care Planning for Teens With Cancer
Lyon, M. E., Jacobs, S., Briggs, L., Cheng, Y. I., & Wang, J. (2013) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.943 · Cited by 223
Wiener, L., Ballard, E., Brennan, T., Battles, H., Martinez, P., & Pao, M. (2008) · Journal of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1089/jpm.2008.0126 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Hinds, P. S., Drew, D., Oakes, L. L., Fouladi, M., Spunt, S. L., Church, C., & Furman, W. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2005-12-20
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 9146-9154
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2171744648
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: End-of-Life Care Preferences of Pediatric Patients With Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.10.538
- The paper
- Hinds, P. S., Drew, D., Oakes, L. L., Fouladi, M., Spunt, S. L., Church, C., & Furman, W. L. (2005). End-of-Life Care Preferences of Pediatric Patients With Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.10.538
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.