Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 524

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chemoimmunotherapy With Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide, and Rituximab for Relapsed and Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Wierda, William, O’Brien, Susan, Wen, Sijin, Faderl, Stefan, Garcia-Manero, Guillermo, Thomas, Deborah, Do, Kim-Anh, Cortes, Jorge, Koller, Charles, Beran, Miloslav, Ferrajoli, Alessandra, Giles, Francis, Lerner, Susan, Albitar, Maher, Kantarjian, Hagop, Keating, Michael·2005·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The efficacy, toxicity, and tolerability of chemoimmunotherapy with the combination of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) were evaluated in previously treated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The purpose of this study was to improve the complete remission (CR) rate for previously treated patients and evaluate the quality of bone marrow response. Patients and Methods: One hundred seventy-seven previously treated patients with CLL were evaluated. Treatment consisted of rituximab 375 mg/m 2 day 1 of course 1 and 500 mg/m 2 day 1 of courses 2 to 6; fludarabine 25 mg/m 2/d days 2 to 4 of course 1 and days 1 to 3 of courses 2 to 6; and cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m 2/d days 2 to 4 of course 1 and days 1 to 3 of courses 2 to 6. Courses were repeated every 4 weeks. Results: CR was achieved in 25% of 177 patients, and nodular partial remission and partial remission were achieved in 16% and 32% of patients, respectively; the overall response rate was 73%. Twelve (32%) of 37 complete responders tested achieved molecular remission in bone marrow. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify pretreatment patient characteristics associated with CR and overall remission, longer time to progression, and overall survival. Conclusion: The FCR regimen was an active and well-tolerated treatment for previously treated patients with CLL. Myelosuppression was the most common toxicity. FCR induced the highest CR rate reported in a clinical trial of previously treated patients with CLL. Furthermore, molecular remissions were achieved in a third of patients achieving CR.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2005.12.516

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 524

Metadata

Authors
Wierda, W., O’Brien, S., Wen, S., Faderl, S., Garcia-Manero, G., Thomas, D., Do, K.-A., Cortes, J., Koller, C., Beran, M., Ferrajoli, A., Giles, F., Lerner, S., Albitar, M., Kantarjian, H., & Keating, M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2005-06-20
Volume
23
Issue
18
Pages
4070-4078
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2117648265
Cited by
524
References
1
FWCI
24.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemoimmunotherapy With Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide, and Rituximab for Relapsed and Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.12.516
The paper
Wierda, W., O’Brien, S., Wen, S., Faderl, S., Garcia-Manero, G., Thomas, D., Do, K.-A., Cortes, J., Koller, C., Beran, M., Ferrajoli, A., Giles, F., Lerner, S., Albitar, M., Kantarjian, H., & Keating, M. (2005). Chemoimmunotherapy With Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide, and Rituximab for Relapsed and Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.12.516

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.