The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of Breast Tumor Progression by Integrity of Free Circulating DNA in Serum
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Cell-free DNA circulating in serum is a candidate molecular biomarker for malignant tumors. Unlike uniformly truncated DNA released from apoptotic cells, DNA released from dead cancer cells varies in size. Serum DNA integrity, the ratio of longer fragments to total DNA, may be clinically useful for detecting breast cancer progression. Patients and Methods: Serum samples from 51 healthy females and 83 females with primary breast cancers (eight American Joint Committee on Cancer stage 0, 24 stage I, 27 stage II, 21 stage III, and three stage IV) were assessed preoperatively. Serum DNA integrity was assessed by fragment length-dependent quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction of ALU DNA repeats. Results: Mean serum DNA integrity was significantly higher in patients with stage II, III, and IV breast cancers than in healthy females (P = .005, P < .0001, and P = .002, respectively). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for discriminating patients with stage II or more advanced breast cancers from healthy females had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.86). Mean serum DNA integrity was positively correlated to size of invasive cancers (r = 0.48; P < .0001) and significantly higher in the presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI; 0.25 ± 0.02 v 0.17 ± 0.02; P < .0001) or lymph node (LN) metastasis (0.27 ± 0.02 v 0.14 ± 0.02; P < .0001). The ROC curve for discriminating LN metastasis had an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.89). Serum DNA integrity and LVI were significant for predicting LN metastasis in a multivariate analysis (P = .0002 and P < .0001, respectively). Conclusion: Integrity of serum circulating DNA is a promising molecular biomarker for detecting breast cancer tumor progression and regional LN metastases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Giacona, M. B., Ruben, G. C., Iczkowski, K. A., Roos, T. B., Porter, D. M., & Sorenson, G. D. (1998) · Pancreas · doi:10.1097/00006676-199807000-00012 · Cited by 387
Cited by
Genome-wide cell-free DNA fragmentation in patients with cancer
Cristiano, S., Leal, A., Phallen, J., Fiksel, J., Adleff, V., Bruhm, D. C., Jensen, S. Ø., Medina, J. E., Hruban, C., White, J. R., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1272-6 · Cited by 1,476
High Fragmentation Characterizes Tumour-Derived Circulating DNA
Mouliere, F., Robert, B., Arnau Peyrotte, E., Del Rio, M., Ychou, M., Molina, F., Gongora, C., & Thierry, A. R. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023418 · Cited by 567
Cell-free DNA in the blood as a solid tumor biomarker–a critical appraisal of the literature
Jung, K., Fleischhacker, M., & Rabien, A. (2010) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.cca.2010.07.032 · Cited by 337
Ellinger, J., Albers, P., Müller, S. C., Von Ruecker, A., & Bastian, P. J. (2009) · BJU International · doi:10.1111/j.1464-410x.2008.08289.x · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Umetani, N., Giuliano, A. E., Hiramatsu, S. H., Amersi, F., Nakagawa, T., Martino, S., & Hoon, D. S. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2006-09-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 4270-4276
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2100675674
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of Breast Tumor Progression by Integrity of Free Circulating DNA in Serum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2006.05.9493
- The paper
- Umetani, N., Giuliano, A. E., Hiramatsu, S. H., Amersi, F., Nakagawa, T., Martino, S., & Hoon, D. S. B. (2006). Prediction of Breast Tumor Progression by Integrity of Free Circulating DNA in Serum. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.05.9493
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.