The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic Review on the Efficacy of Cytoreductive Surgery Combined With Perioperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis From Colorectal Carcinoma
Abstract
Purpose: The efficacy of cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal carcinoma remains to be established. Methods: A systematic review of relevant studies before March 2006 was performed. Two reviewers independently appraised each study using a predetermined protocol. The quality of studies was assessed. Clinical effectiveness was synthesized through a narrative review with full tabulation of results of all included studies. Results: Two randomized controlled trials, one comparative study, one multi-institutional registry study, and 10 most recent case-series studies were evaluated. The level of evidence was low in 13 of the 14 eligible studies. The median survival varied from 13 to 29 months, and 5-year survival rates ranged from 11% to 19%. Patients who received complete cytoreduction benefited most, with median survival varying from 28 to 60 months and 5-year survival ranging from 22% to 49%. The overall morbidity rate varied from 23% to 44%, and the mortality rate ranged from 0% to 12%. Conclusion: The current evidence suggests that cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy is associated with an improved survival, as compared with systemic chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal carcinoma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bevacizumab plus Irinotecan, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Hurwitz, H., Fehrenbacher, L., Novotny, W., Cartwright, T., Hainsworth, J., Heim, W., Berlin, J., Baron, A., Griffing, S., Holmgren, E., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032691 · Cited by 10,968
Douillard, J., Cunningham, D., Roth, A., Navarro, M., James, R., Karasek, P., Jandik, P., Iveson, T., Carmichael, J., Alakl, M., et al. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02034-1 · Cited by 3,256
Cited by
Chua, T. C., Yan, T. D., Saxena, A., & Morris, D. L. (2009) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181a45d86 · Cited by 532
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yan, T. D., Black, D., Savady, R., & Sugarbaker, P. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2006-08-20
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 4011-4019
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2058884490
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic Review on the Efficacy of Cytoreductive Surgery Combined With Perioperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis From Colorectal Carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2006.07.1142
- The paper
- Yan, T. D., Black, D., Savady, R., & Sugarbaker, P. H. (2006). Systematic Review on the Efficacy of Cytoreductive Surgery Combined With Perioperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis From Colorectal Carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.07.1142
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.