The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Impact of Chemoradiotherapy After Disease Control With Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in GERCOR Phase II and III Studies
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The management of locally advanced (LA) pancreatic cancer patients remains controversial. To select patients who could benefit from chemoradiotherapy (CRT), the therapeutic strategy used by the Groupe Coopérateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie (GERCOR) consisted of initial chemotherapy (CT) for at least 3 months. The decision to administer CRT or continue CT in nonprogressive patients was the investigator's choice. Patients and Methods: Retrospective analysis of outcome in 181 patients with LA pancreatic cancer (76 women and 105 men; mean age, 61 years; range, 37 to 85 years) enrolled onto prospective phase II and III GERCOR studies was performed to compare the survival of patients who received CRT with that of patients who continued CT alone. Results: Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times for the 181 patients were 6.3 and 11.4 months, respectively. Fifty-three patients (29.3%) had metastatic disease after 3 months of CT and were not eligible for CRT. Among the 128 remaining patients (70.3%) who had no disease progression and who were, therefore, eligible for CRT, 72 (56%) received CRT (group A), whereas 56 (44%) continued with CT (group B). The two groups were balanced for initial characteristics (performance status, sex, age, and type of CT), as well as for induction CT results. In groups A and B, the median PFS times were 10.8 and 7.4 months, respectively (P = .005), and the median OS times were 15.0 and 11.7 months, respectively (P = .0009). Conclusion: These results suggest that, after control of disease by initial CT, CRT could significantly improve survival in patients with LA pancreatic cancer compared with CT alone. A prospective phase III study is ongoing to evaluate this strategy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hidalgo, M. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0901557 · Cited by 2,570
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Tempero, M. A., Malafa, M. P., Al-Hawary, M., Asbun, H., Bain, A., Behrman, S. W., Benson, A. B., Binder, E., Cardin, D. B., Cha, C., et al. (2017) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2017.0131 · Cited by 1,020
Mukherjee, S., Hurt, C. N., Bridgewater, J., Falk, S., Cummins, S., Wasan, H., Crosby, T., Jephcott, C., Roy, R., Radhakrishna, G., et al. (2013) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70021-4 · Cited by 355
Crane, C. H., Varadhachary, G. R., Yordy, J. S., Staerkel, G. A., Javle, M. M., Safran, H., Haque, W., Hobbs, B. D., Krishnan, S., Fleming, J. B., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2010.33.8038 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Huguet, F., André, T., Hammel, P., Artru, P., Balosso, J., Selle, F., Deniaud-Alexandre, E., Ruszniewski, P., Touboul, E., Labianca, R., de Gramont, A., & Louvet, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2007-01-20
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 326-331
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2142795752
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of Chemoradiotherapy After Disease Control With Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in GERCOR Phase II and III Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2006.07.5663
- The paper
- Huguet, F., André, T., Hammel, P., Artru, P., Balosso, J., Selle, F., Deniaud-Alexandre, E., Ruszniewski, P., Touboul, E., Labianca, R., de Gramont, A., & Louvet, C. (2007). Impact of Chemoradiotherapy After Disease Control With Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in GERCOR Phase II and III Studies. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.07.5663
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.