Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 298

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Phase III Trial of Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin As Adjuvant Therapy for Stage III Colon Cancer: A Planned Safety Analysis in 1,864 Patients

Schmoll, Hans-Joachim, Cartwright, Thomas, Tabernero, Josep, Nowacki, Marek P., Figer, Arie, Maroun, Jean, Price, Timothy, Lim, Robert, Van Cutsem, Eric, Park, Young-Suk, McKendrick, Joseph, Topham, Claire, Soler-Gonzalez, Gemma, de Braud, Filipo, Hill, Mark, Sirzén, Florin, Haller, Daniel G.·2007·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To report the results of a planned safety analysis from a phase III trial comparing capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) with bolus fluorouracil/leucovorin (FU/LV) as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer. Patients and Methods: Patients with stage III colon carcinoma were randomly assigned to receive either XELOX (intravenous oxaliplatin plus oral capecitabine; 3-week cycle for eight cycles) or standard intravenous bolus FU/LV administered as the Mayo Clinic (Mayo; Rochester, MN) or Roswell Park (RP; Buffalo, NY) regimen for a similar length of time. A total of 1,886 patients were randomly assigned. Results: The safety population comprised 1,864 patients, of whom 938 received XELOX and 926 received FU/LV. Most treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred at similar rates in both treatment arms. However, patients receiving XELOX experienced less all-grade diarrhea, alopecia, and more neurosensory toxicity, vomiting, and hand-foot syndrome than those patients receiving FU/LV. Compared with Mayo, XELOX showed fewer grade 3/4 hematologic AE and more grade 3/4 gastrointestinal AE. Compared with RP, XELOX showed less grade 3/4 gastrointestinal AE and more grade 3/4 hematologic AE. As expected grade 3/4 neurosensory toxicity and grade 3 hand-foot syndrome were higher with XELOX. Treatment-related mortality within 28 days from the last study dose was 0.6% in the XELOX group and 0.6% in the FU/LV group. Conclusion: XELOX has a manageable tolerability profile in the adjuvant setting. Efficacy data will be available within the next 24 months.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2006.08.1075

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 298

Metadata

Authors
Schmoll, H.-J., Cartwright, T., Tabernero, J., Nowacki, M. P., Figer, A., Maroun, J., Price, T., Lim, R., Van Cutsem, E., Park, Y.-S., McKendrick, J., Topham, C., Soler-Gonzalez, G., de Braud, F., Hill, M., Sirzén, F., & Haller, D. G.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2007-01-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
102-109
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2069030010
Cited by
298
References
0
FWCI
7.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase III Trial of Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin As Adjuvant Therapy for Stage III Colon Cancer: A Planned Safety Analysis in 1,864 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2006.08.1075
The paper
Schmoll, H.-J., Cartwright, T., Tabernero, J., Nowacki, M. P., Figer, A., Maroun, J., Price, T., Lim, R., Van Cutsem, E., Park, Y.-S., McKendrick, J., Topham, C., Soler-Gonzalez, G., de Braud, F., Hill, M., Sirzén, F., & Haller, D. G. (2007). Phase III Trial of Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin As Adjuvant Therapy for Stage III Colon Cancer: A Planned Safety Analysis in 1,864 Patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.08.1075

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.