Direct Intracerebral Delivery of Cintredekin Besudotox (IL13-PE38QQR) in Recurrent Malignant Glioma: A Report by the Cintredekin Besudotox Intraparenchymal Study Group
Abstract
Purpose: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a devastating brain tumor with a median survival of 6 months after recurrence. Cintredekin besudotox (CB) is a recombinant protein consisting of interleukin-13 (IL-13) and a truncated form of Pseudomonas exotoxin (PE38QQR). Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is a locoregional-administration method leading to high-tissue concentrations with large volume of distributions. We assessed the use of intracerebral CED to deliver CB in patients with recurrent malignant glioma (MG). Patients and Methods: Three phase I clinical studies evaluated intracerebral CED of CB along with tumor resection. The main objectives were to assess the tolerability of various concentrations and infusion durations; tissue distribution; and methods for optimizing delivery. All patients underwent tumor resection followed by a single intraparenchymal infusion (in addition to the intraparenchymal one following resection), with a portion of patients who had a preresection intratumoral infusion. Results: A total of 51 patients with MG were treated including 46 patients with GBM. The maximum tolerated intraparenchymal concentration was 0.5 μg/mL and tumor necrosis was observed at this concentration. Infusion durations of up to 6 days were well tolerated. Postoperative catheter placement appears to be important for optimal drug distribution. CB- and procedure-related adverse events were primarily limited to the CNS. Overall median survival for GBM patients is 42.7 weeks and 55.6 weeks for patients with optimally positioned catheters with patient follow-up extending beyond 5 years. Conclusion: CB appears to have a favorable risk-benefit profile. CED is a complex delivery method requiring catheter placement via a second procedure to achieve accurate catheter positioning, better drug distribution, and better outcome.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Intracerebral injections are clinically feasible and are performed in a variety of clinical scenarios and preclinical settings.
“Intracerebral injections are clinically feasible, and are performed in a variety of clinical scenarios (17–23), as well as in various preclinical settings (4, 24–27).”
From Lipid Nanoparticles Deliver mRNA to the Brain after an Intracerebral Injection (2023) · cites this paper as [18]
Cites
Radiotherapy Plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma
Stupp, R., Mason, W. P., van den Bent, M. J., Weller, M., Fisher, B., Taphoorn, M. J. B., Belanger, K., Brandes, A. A., Marosi, C., Bogdahn, U., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa043330 · Cited by 21,807 · see citing works
Yung, W. K. A., Albright, R. E., Olson, J., Fredericks, R., Fink, K., Prados, M. D., Brada, M., Spence, A., Hohl, R. J., Shapiro, W., et al. (2000) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1054/bjoc.2000.1316 · Cited by 929 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bogdahn, U., Hau, P., Stockhammer, G., Venkataramana, N. K., Mahapatra, A. K., Suri, A., Balasubramaniam, A., Nair, S., Oliushine, V., Parfenov, V., et al. (2011) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noq142 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Evolving Drug Delivery Strategies to Overcome the Blood Brain Barrier
S. Hersh, D., S. Wadajkar, A., B. Roberts, N., G. Perez, J., P. Connolly, N., Frenkel, V., A. Winkles, J., F. Woodworth, G., & J. Kim, A. (2016) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/1381612822666151221150733 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Insights into Cytokine–Receptor Interactions from Cytokine Engineering
Spangler, J. B., Moraga, I., Mendoza, J. L., & Garcia, K. C. (2015) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120211 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Lipid Nanoparticles Deliver mRNA to the Brain after an Intracerebral Injection
Tuma, J., Chen, Y.-J., Collins, M. G., Paul, A., Li, J., Han, H., Sharma, R., Murthy, N., & Lee, H. Y. (2023) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.biochem.3c00371 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kunwar, S., Prados, M. D., Chang, S. M., Berger, M. S., Lang, F. F., Piepmeier, J. M., Sampson, J. H., Ram, Z., Gutin, P. H., Gibbons, R. D., Aldape, K. D., Croteau, D. J., Sherman, J. W., & Puri, R. K.
- Affiliations
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2007-03-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 837-844
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2002972290
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 15.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Keywords
- IL-13, Pseudomonas exotoxin, convection-enhanced delivery, intracerebral drug delivery, recurrent malignant glioma, glioblastoma, catheter positioning, infusion duration, tumor necrosis, drug distribution, tolerability, survival
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Immunotoxins, Catheterization, Exotoxins, Female, Glioma, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Tissue Distribution, Supratentorial Neoplasms, Drug Delivery Systems, Convection, Interleukin-13
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review