The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Survival of Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Nolatrexed or Doxorubicin
Abstract
Purpose: The study objective was to compare the overall survival (OS) of patients with unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with nolatrexed (NOL) or doxorubicin (DOX). Patients and Methods: Patients from North America, Europe, and South Africa (N = 445) with HCC were randomly assigned to receive NOL or DOX. Eligible patients had Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥ 60%, Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) score ≤ 3, and adequate organ function. Primary end point was OS. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates, and safety. The treatment groups were well-balanced with regards to age, sex, ethnic origin, and underlying liver disease. Randomization was stratified according to KPS and CLIP score. Results: At the time of the final analysis, 377 patients had died. Median OS was 22.3 weeks for NOL and 32.3 weeks for DOX (P = .0068). The hazard ratio was 0.753 in favor of DOX. Objective response rate (complete response [CR] plus partial response [PR]) was 1.4% for NOL and 4.0% for DOX. Median PFS was 12 weeks for NOL and 10 weeks for DOX (P = .7091). Median time to treatment failure was 8.4 weeks for NOL and 9.1 weeks for DOX (P = .0969). Grade 3 and 4 stomatitis, vomiting, diarrhea, and thrombocytopenia were more common in the NOL arm. Alopecia was more common in the DOX arm. More patients were withdrawn from study for toxicity in the NOL arm than in the DOX arm. Conclusion: NOL showed minimal activity in this phase III trial. Further exploration at this dose and schedule in HCC is not warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma
Galle, P. R., Forner, A., Llovet, J. M., Mazzaferro, V., Piscaglia, F., Raoul, J.-L., Schirmacher, P., & Vilgrain, V. (2018) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019 · Cited by 11,406
EASL–EORTC Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma
European Association for the Study of the Liver, & European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (2012) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2011.12.001 · Cited by 5,218
Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Escudier, B., Porta, C., Schmidinger, M., Algaba, F., Patard, J. J., Khoo, V., Eisen, T., & Horwich, A. (2014) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu259 · Cited by 2,251
Self-citationHepatocellular carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Vogel, A., Cervantes, A., Chau, I., Daniele, B., Llovet, J. M., Meyer, T., Nault, J. C., Neumann, U., Ricke, J., Sangro, B., et al. (2018) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy308 · Cited by 1,048
Novel advancements in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma in 2008
Llovet, J. M., & Bruix, J. (2008) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2008.01.022 · Cited by 815
Metadata
- Authors
- Gish, R. G., Porta, C., Lazar, L., Ruff, P., Feld, R., Croitoru, A., Feun, L., Jeziorski, K., Leighton, J., Knox, J., Gallo, J., & Kennealey, G. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2007-07-20
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 3069-3075
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2111077571
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Survival of Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Nolatrexed or Doxorubicin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2006.08.4046
- The paper
- Gish, R. G., Porta, C., Lazar, L., Ruff, P., Feld, R., Croitoru, A., Feun, L., Jeziorski, K., Leighton, J., Knox, J., Gallo, J., & Kennealey, G. T. (2007). Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Survival of Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Nolatrexed or Doxorubicin. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.08.4046
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.