The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reproductive and Sexual Function After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Long-Term Ovarian Germ Cell Tumor Survivors: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
Abstract
Purpose: To compare malignant ovarian germ cell tumor survivors with a matched control group of females on menstrual and reproductive outcomes, sexual functioning, and dyadic adjustment. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients met the following criteria: (1) history of malignant ovarian germ cell tumor; (2) treatment with surgery plus platinum-based chemotherapy; (3) age at least 18 years and continuously disease-free with minimum follow-up of 2 years; (4) capability of completing questionnaire and telephone interview; and (5) completion of written informed consent. The control group was drawn from acquaintances recommended by survivors and matched for age, race, and education. Scales with established reliability and validity were used to measure quality-of-life concepts of sexual functioning and social networks. Results: One hundred thirty-two survivors and 137 controls completed the study. Of 132 survivors, 71 (53.8%) had fertility-sparing surgery. Of fertile survivors, 62 (87.3%) reported still having menstrual periods. Twenty-four survivors reported 37 offspring after cancer treatment. Compared with controls, survivors had significantly greater reproductive concerns (P < .0001), less sexual pleasure (P = .003), and lower scores on the total Sexual Activity Scale Score (P = .001). However, survivors had better dyadic consensus (P = .004), dyadic satisfaction (P = .005), and dyadic cohesion (P = .014). Conclusion: Women who had fertility-sparing surgery were very likely to retain menstrual function and fertility after chemotherapy. Although there is some increase in gynecologic symptoms and diminution in sexual pleasure, survivors tended to have stronger, more positive relationships with significant others.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sexuality in Adult Cancer Survivors: Challenges and Intervention
Bober, S. L., & Varela, V. S. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.41.7915 · Cited by 448
Psychological and interpersonal dimensions of sexual function and dysfunction
Brotto, L., Atallah, S., Johnson-Agbakwu, C., Rosenbaum, T., Abdo, C., Byers, E. S., Graham, C., Nobre, P., & Wylie, K. (2016) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.019 · Cited by 439
Sadovsky, R., Basson, R., Krychman, M., Morales, A. M., Schover, L., Wang, R., & Incrocci, L. (2010) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01620.x · Cited by 310
A systematic review of sexual concerns reported by gynecological cancer survivors
Abbott-Anderson, K., & Kwekkeboom, K. L. (2012) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.11.030 · Cited by 263
Manne, S. L., Winkel, G., Rubin, S., Edelson, M., Rosenblum, N., Bergman, C., Hernandez, E., Carlson, J., & Rocereto, T. (2008) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0014071 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Gershenson, D. M., Miller, A. M., Champion, V. L., Monahan, P. O., Zhao, Q., Cella, D., & Williams, S. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2007-07-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 2792-2797
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2150626527
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproductive and Sexual Function After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Long-Term Ovarian Germ Cell Tumor Survivors: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2006.08.4590
- The paper
- Gershenson, D. M., Miller, A. M., Champion, V. L., Monahan, P. O., Zhao, Q., Cella, D., & Williams, S. D. (2007). Reproductive and Sexual Function After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Long-Term Ovarian Germ Cell Tumor Survivors: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.08.4590
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.