The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Efficacy and Safety of Ixabepilone (BMS-247550) in a Phase II Study of Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer Resistant to an Anthracycline, a Taxane, and Capecitabine
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ixabepilone in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) resistant to anthracycline, taxane, and capecitabine, in this multicenter, phase II study. Patients and Methods: Patients with measurable disease who had tumor progression while receiving prior anthracycline, taxane, and capecitabine were enrolled. Ixabepilone 40 mg/m 2 monotherapy was administered as a 3-hour intravenous infusion on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR), assessed by an independent radiology facility (IRF). Results: A total of 126 patients were treated and 113 were assessable for response. Patients were heavily pretreated: 88% had received at least two lines of prior chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. IRF-assessed ORR was 11.5% (95% CI, 6.3% to 18.9%) for response-assessable patients. Investigator-assessed ORR for all treated patients was 18.3% (95% CI, 11.9% to 26.1%). Fifty percent of patients achieved stable disease (SD); 14.3% achieved SD ≥ 6 months. Median duration of response and progression-free survival were 5.7 and 3.1 months, respectively. Median overall survival was 8.6 months. Patients received a median of 4.0 treatment cycles (range, one to 16 cycles), and 25% of patients received ≥ eight cycles. Grade 3/4 treatment-related events included peripheral sensory neuropathy (14%), fatigue/asthenia (13%), myalgia (8%), and stomatitis/mucositis (6%). Resolution of grade 3/4 peripheral sensory neuropathy occurred after a median period of 5.4 weeks. Conclusion: Ixabepilone demonstrated clear activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with MBC resistant to anthracycline, taxane, and capecitabine. Responses were durable and notable in patients who had not previously responded to multiple prior therapies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Audeh, M. W., Carmichael, J., Penson, R. T., Friedlander, M., Powell, B., Bell-McGuinn, K. M., Scott, C., Weitzel, J. N., Oaknin, A., Loman, N., et al. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60893-8 · Cited by 2,279
Tutt, A., Robson, M., Garber, J. E., Domchek, S. M., Audeh, M. W., Weitzel, J. N., Friedlander, M., Arun, B., Loman, N., Schmutzler, R. K., et al. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60892-6 · Cited by 1,655
Modi, S., Park, H., Murthy, R. K., Iwata, H., Tamura, K., Tsurutani, J., Moreno-Aspitia, A., Doi, T., Sagara, Y., Redfern, C., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.19.02318 · Cited by 787
Perez, E. A., Romond, E. H., Suman, V. J., Jeong, J.-H., Davidson, N. E., Geyer, C. E., Martino, S., Mamounas, E. P., Kaufman, P. A., & Wolmark, N. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.35.0868 · Cited by 717
Self-citationDickler, M. N., Tolaney, S. M., Rugo, H. S., Cortés, J., Diéras, V., Patt, D., Wildiers, H., Hudis, C. A., O'Shaughnessy, J., Zamora, E., et al. (2017) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-0754 · Cited by 676
Metadata
- Authors
- Perez, E. A., Lerzo, G., Pivot, X., Thomas, E., Vahdat, L., Bosserman, L., Viens, P., Cai, C., Mullaney, B., Peck, R., & Hortobagyi, G. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2007-08-10
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 3407-3414
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2119974083
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy and Safety of Ixabepilone (BMS-247550) in a Phase II Study of Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer Resistant to an Anthracycline, a Taxane, and Capecitabine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2006.09.3849
- The paper
- Perez, E. A., Lerzo, G., Pivot, X., Thomas, E., Vahdat, L., Bosserman, L., Viens, P., Cai, C., Mullaney, B., Peck, R., & Hortobagyi, G. N. (2007). Efficacy and Safety of Ixabepilone (BMS-247550) in a Phase II Study of Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer Resistant to an Anthracycline, a Taxane, and Capecitabine. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.09.3849
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.