The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phase II Clinical Trial of Ixabepilone (BMS-247550), an Epothilone B Analog, As First-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With Anthracycline Chemotherapy
Abstract
Purpose: There is a need for new agents to treat metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in patients for whom anthracycline therapy has failed or is contraindicated. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of the novel antineoplastic, the epothilone B analog ixabepilone, in patients with MBC previously treated with an adjuvant anthracycline. Patients and Methods: Patients were age ≥ 18 years and had received a prior anthracycline-based regimen as adjuvant treatment. Ixabepilone as first-line metastatic chemotherapy was administered as a 40 mg/m 2 intravenous infusion during 3 hours every 3 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary efficacy end points included duration of response, time to response, time to progression, and survival. Results: All 65 patients were assessable for response. Their median age was 52 years (range, 33 to 80 years). ORR was 41.5% (95% CI, 29.4% to 54.4%), median duration of response was 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 10.2 months), and median time to response was 6 weeks (range, 5 to 17 weeks). Median survival was 22.0 months (95% CI, 15.6 to 27.0 months). Treatment-related adverse events were manageable and mostly grades 1/2: the most common of these (other than alopecia) was mild to moderate neuropathy, which was primarily sensory and mostly reversible in nature. Conclusion: Ixabepilone is efficacious and has a predictable and manageable safety profile in women with MBC previously treated with an adjuvant anthracycline.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.
Simon, R. (1989) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(89)90015-9 · Cited by 3,636
Cited by
Perez, E. A. (2009) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-09-0366 · Cited by 521
Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy: A comprehensive survey
Miltenburg, N. C., & Boogerd, W. (2014) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.04.004 · Cited by 431
Metadata
- Authors
- Roché, H., Yelle, L., Cognetti, F., Mauriac, L., Bunnell, C., Sparano, J., Kerbrat, P., Delord, J.-P., Vahdat, L., Peck, R., Lebwohl, D., Ezzeddine, R., & Curé, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2007-08-10
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 3415-3420
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2112901840
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase II Clinical Trial of Ixabepilone (BMS-247550), an Epothilone B Analog, As First-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With Anthracycline Chemotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2006.09.7535
- The paper
- Roché, H., Yelle, L., Cognetti, F., Mauriac, L., Bunnell, C., Sparano, J., Kerbrat, P., Delord, J.-P., Vahdat, L., Peck, R., Lebwohl, D., Ezzeddine, R., & Curé, H. (2007). Phase II Clinical Trial of Ixabepilone (BMS-247550), an Epothilone B Analog, As First-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With Anthracycline Chemotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.09.7535
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.