The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prognostic Factors for Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Conflicting results on prognostic factors for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have been reported because of small sample size and heterogeneity of study population. The purpose of this study was to identify factors predictive of poor prognosis in a similarly treated population of women with advanced EOC. Patients and Methods: A retrospective review of demographic, pathologic, treatment, and outcome data from 1,895 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III EOC who had undergone primary surgery followed by six cycles of intravenous platinum/paclitaxel was conducted. A proportional hazards model was used to assess the association of prognostic factors with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Increasing age was associated with increased risks for disease progression (HR = 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.11 for an increase every 10 years) and death (HR = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.18). Mucinous or clear-cell histology was associated with a worse PFS and OS compared with serous carcinomas. Patients with performance status (PS) 1 or 2 were at an increased risk for recurrence compared with PS 0 (HR = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.24). Compared with patients with microscopic residual disease, patients with 0.1 to 1.0 cm and > 1.0 cm residual disease had an increased risk of recurrence (HR = 1.96; 95% CI, 1.70 to 2.26; and HR = 2.36; 95% CI, 2.04 to 2.73, respectively) and death (HR = 2.11; 95% CI, 1.78 to 2.49; P < .001; and HR = 2.47; 95% CI, 2.09 to 2.92, respectively). Conclusion: Age, PS, tumor histology, and residual tumor volume were independent predictors of prognosis in patients with stage III EOC. These data can be used to identify patients with poor prognosis and to design future tailored randomized clinical trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
du Bois, A., Reuss, A., Pujade‐Lauraine, E., Harter, P., Ray‐Coquard, I., & Pfisterer, J. (2009) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.24149 · Cited by 1,638
Homologous Recombination Deficiency: Exploiting the Fundamental Vulnerability of Ovarian Cancer
Konstantinopoulos, P. A., Ceccaldi, R., Shapiro, G. I., & D'Andrea, A. D. (2015) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-15-0714 · Cited by 945
Invasive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Survival by Histotype and Disease Stage
Peres, L. C., Cushing-Haugen, K. L., Köbel, M., Harris, H. R., Berchuck, A., Rossing, M. A., Schildkraut, J. M., & Doherty, J. A. (2019) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djy071 · Cited by 554
Multicellular spheroids in ovarian cancer metastases: Biology and pathology
Shield, K., Ackland, M. L., Ahmed, N., & Rice, G. E. (2009) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.11.032 · Cited by 412
Wright, A. A., Bohlke, K., Armstrong, D. K., Bookman, M. A., Cliby, W. A., Coleman, R. L., Dizon, D. S., Kash, J. J., Meyer, L. A., Moore, K. N., et al. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2016.68.6907 · Cited by 409
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Winter, W. E., Maxwell, G. L., Tian, C., Carlson, J. W., Ozols, R. F., Rose, P. G., Markman, M., Armstrong, D. K., Muggia, F., & McGuire, W. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2007-08-20
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 3621-3627
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2147539392
- Cited by
- 845
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 42.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Factors for Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2006.10.2517
- The paper
- Winter, W. E., Maxwell, G. L., Tian, C., Carlson, J. W., Ozols, R. F., Rose, P. G., Markman, M., Armstrong, D. K., Muggia, F., & McGuire, W. P. (2007). Prognostic Factors for Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.10.2517
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.