Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 845

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prognostic Factors for Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

Open access
Winter, William E., Maxwell, G. Larry, Tian, Chunqiao, Carlson, Jay W., Ozols, Robert F., Rose, Peter G., Markman, Maurie, Armstrong, Deborah K., Muggia, Franco, McGuire, William P.·2007·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Conflicting results on prognostic factors for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have been reported because of small sample size and heterogeneity of study population. The purpose of this study was to identify factors predictive of poor prognosis in a similarly treated population of women with advanced EOC. Patients and Methods: A retrospective review of demographic, pathologic, treatment, and outcome data from 1,895 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III EOC who had undergone primary surgery followed by six cycles of intravenous platinum/paclitaxel was conducted. A proportional hazards model was used to assess the association of prognostic factors with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Increasing age was associated with increased risks for disease progression (HR = 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.11 for an increase every 10 years) and death (HR = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.18). Mucinous or clear-cell histology was associated with a worse PFS and OS compared with serous carcinomas. Patients with performance status (PS) 1 or 2 were at an increased risk for recurrence compared with PS 0 (HR = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.24). Compared with patients with microscopic residual disease, patients with 0.1 to 1.0 cm and > 1.0 cm residual disease had an increased risk of recurrence (HR = 1.96; 95% CI, 1.70 to 2.26; and HR = 2.36; 95% CI, 2.04 to 2.73, respectively) and death (HR = 2.11; 95% CI, 1.78 to 2.49; P < .001; and HR = 2.47; 95% CI, 2.09 to 2.92, respectively). Conclusion: Age, PS, tumor histology, and residual tumor volume were independent predictors of prognosis in patients with stage III EOC. These data can be used to identify patients with poor prognosis and to design future tailored randomized clinical trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2006.10.2517

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 845

Metadata

Authors
Winter, W. E., Maxwell, G. L., Tian, C., Carlson, J. W., Ozols, R. F., Rose, P. G., Markman, M., Armstrong, D. K., Muggia, F., & McGuire, W. P.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2007-08-20
Volume
25
Issue
24
Pages
3621-3627
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2147539392
Cited by
845
References
0
FWCI
42.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Factors for Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2006.10.2517
The paper
Winter, W. E., Maxwell, G. L., Tian, C., Carlson, J. W., Ozols, R. F., Rose, P. G., Markman, M., Armstrong, D. K., Muggia, F., & McGuire, W. P. (2007). Prognostic Factors for Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.10.2517

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.