Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 216

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Taxanes Alone or in Combination With Anthracyclines As First-Line Therapy of Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer

Open access
Piccart-Gebhart, Martine J., Burzykowski, Tomasz, Buyse, Marc, Sledge, George, Carmichael, James, Lück, Hans-Joachim, Mackey, John R., Nabholtz, Jean-Marc, Paridaens, Robert, Biganzoli, Laura, Jassem, Jacek, Bontenbal, Marijke, Bonneterre, Jacques, Chan, Stephen, Basaran, Gul Atalay, Therasse, Patrick·2008·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Taxanes (paclitaxel or docetaxel) have been sequenced or combined with anthracyclines (doxorubicin or epirubicin) for the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer. This meta-analysis uses data from all relevant trials to detect any advantages of taxanes in terms of tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and survival. Patients and Methods: Individual patient data were collected on eight randomized combination trials comparing anthracyclines + taxanes (+ cyclophosphamide in one trial) with anthracyclines + cyclophosphamide (+ fluorouracil in four trials), and on three single-agent trials comparing taxanes with anthracyclines. Combination trials included 3,034 patients; single-agent trials included 919 patients. Results: Median follow-up of living patients was 43 months, median survival was 19.3 months, and median PFS was 7.1 months. In single-agent trials, response rates were similar in the taxanes (38%) and in the anthracyclines (33%) arms (P = .08). The hazard ratios for taxanes compared with anthracyclines were 1.19 (95% CI, 1.04 to 1.36; P = .011) for PFS and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.16; P = .90) for survival. In combination trials, response rates were 57% (10% complete) in taxane-based combinations and 46% (6% complete) in control arms (P < .001). The hazard ratios for taxane-based combinations compared with control arms were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85 to 0.99; P = .031) for PFS and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.03; P = .24) for survival. Conclusion: Taxanes were significantly worse than single-agent anthracyclines in terms of PFS, but not in terms of response rates or survival. Taxane-based combinations were significantly better than anthracycline-based combinations in terms of response rates and PFS, but not in terms of survival.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2007.10.8399

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 216

Metadata

Authors
Piccart-Gebhart, M. J., Burzykowski, T., Buyse, M., Sledge, G., Carmichael, J., Lück, H.-J., Mackey, J. R., Nabholtz, J.-M., Paridaens, R., Biganzoli, L., Jassem, J., Bontenbal, M., Bonneterre, J., Chan, S., Basaran, G. A., & Therasse, P.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2008-04-20
Volume
26
Issue
12
Pages
1980-1986
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2154122152
Cited by
216
References
0
FWCI
10.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Taxanes Alone or in Combination With Anthracyclines As First-Line Therapy of Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2007.10.8399
The paper
Piccart-Gebhart, M. J., Burzykowski, T., Buyse, M., Sledge, G., Carmichael, J., Lück, H.-J., Mackey, J. R., Nabholtz, J.-M., Paridaens, R., Biganzoli, L., Jassem, J., Bontenbal, M., Bonneterre, J., Chan, S., Basaran, G. A., & Therasse, P. (2008). Taxanes Alone or in Combination With Anthracyclines As First-Line Therapy of Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.10.8399

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.