Quality of Life Scores Predict Survival Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine whether quality of life (QOL) scores predict survival among patients with head and neck cancer, controlling for demographic, health behavior, and clinical variables. Patients and Methods: A self-administered questionnaire was given to 495 patients being treated for head and neck cancer while they were waiting to be seen for a clinic appointment. Data collected from the survey included demographics, health behaviors, and QOL as measured by Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical and mental component scores and the Head and Neck QOL scores. Clinical measures were collected by chart abstraction. Kaplan-Meier plots and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the association between QOL scores and survival time. Results: After controlling for age, time since diagnosis, marital status, education, tumor site and stage, comorbidities, and smoking, the SF-36 physical component score and three of the four Head and Neck QOL scales (pain, eating, and speech domains) were associated with survival. Controlling for the same variables, the SF-36 mental component score and the emotional domain of the Head and Neck QOL were not associated with survival. Conclusion: QOL instruments may be valuable screening tools to identify patients who are at high risk for poor survival. Those with low QOL scores could be followed more closely, with the potential to identify recurrence earlier and perform salvage treatments, thereby possibly improving survival for this group of patients.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Poor QoL is associated with a higher risk of mortality in HNC patients [55-57].
“Since poor QoL is associated with a higher risk of mortality in HNC patients [55–57], and psychological interventions targeting body image distress and pain have shown their effectiveness [58], focusing on these dimensions before HNC treatment might be crucial for improving patients’ overall QoL and survival rates.”
From Psychological variables associated with quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer: the role of body image distress (2022) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 179
- Authors
- Karvonen-Gutierrez, C. A., Ronis, D. L., Fowler, K. E., Terrell, J. E., Gruber, S. B., & Duffy, S. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2008-06-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2754-2760
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2098368536
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 14.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
- GlaxoSmithKline
- University of Michigan
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (P50CA97248, P50CA097248)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- quality of life, head and neck cancer, survival prediction, SF-36, prognostic factors, pain, eating difficulties, speech disorders, emotional well-being, cancer screening
- MeSH terms
- Eating, Emotions, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Predictive Value of Tests, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Speech, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review