Cited by 179Head and Neck Cancer StudiesCancer survivorship and careHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Quality of Life Scores Predict Survival Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

Open access
Karvonen-Gutierrez, Carrie A., Ronis, David L., Fowler, Karen E., Terrell, Jeffrey E., Gruber, Stephen B., Duffy, Sonia A.·2008·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine whether quality of life (QOL) scores predict survival among patients with head and neck cancer, controlling for demographic, health behavior, and clinical variables. Patients and Methods: A self-administered questionnaire was given to 495 patients being treated for head and neck cancer while they were waiting to be seen for a clinic appointment. Data collected from the survey included demographics, health behaviors, and QOL as measured by Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical and mental component scores and the Head and Neck QOL scores. Clinical measures were collected by chart abstraction. Kaplan-Meier plots and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the association between QOL scores and survival time. Results: After controlling for age, time since diagnosis, marital status, education, tumor site and stage, comorbidities, and smoking, the SF-36 physical component score and three of the four Head and Neck QOL scales (pain, eating, and speech domains) were associated with survival. Controlling for the same variables, the SF-36 mental component score and the emotional domain of the Head and Neck QOL were not associated with survival. Conclusion: QOL instruments may be valuable screening tools to identify patients who are at high risk for poor survival. Those with low QOL scores could be followed more closely, with the potential to identify recurrence earlier and perform salvage treatments, thereby possibly improving survival for this group of patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2007.12.9510

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 179

Authors
Karvonen-Gutierrez, C. A., Ronis, D. L., Fowler, K. E., Terrell, J. E., Gruber, S. B., & Duffy, S. A.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2008-06-01
Volume
26
Issue
16
Pages
2754-2760
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2098368536
Cited by
179
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 17
FWCI
14.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • University of Michigan
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (P50CA97248, P50CA097248)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
quality of life, head and neck cancer, survival prediction, SF-36, prognostic factors, pain, eating difficulties, speech disorders, emotional well-being, cancer screening
MeSH terms
Eating, Emotions, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Predictive Value of Tests, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Speech, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review