Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 996

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-Term Results From a Randomized Phase II Trial of Standard- Versus Higher-Dose Imatinib Mesylate for Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Expressing KIT

Open access
Blanke, Charles D., Demetri, George D., von Mehren, Margaret, Heinrich, Michael C., Eisenberg, Burton, Fletcher, Jonathan A., Corless, Christopher L., Fletcher, Christopher D.M., Roberts, Peter J., Heinz, Daniela, Wehre, Elisabeth, Nikolova, Zariana, Joensuu, Heikki·2008·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The outcome of patients diagnosed with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and treated long-term with imatinib mesylate is unknown. A previous report of a randomized phase II trial of imatinib mesylate in patients with incurable GIST detailed high response rates at both the 400 and the 600 mg/d dose levels. We conducted a long-term analysis of patients treated on the trial, including patients followed during an extension phase, to evaluate survival, patterns of failure, and potential prognostic factors, including tumor mutational status. Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced GIST were enrolled onto an open-label, multicenter trial and were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive imatinib 400 versus 600 mg/d. Data were prospectively collected on KIT mutational status, total tumor area, and other potential prognostic factors. Patients were followed for a median of 63 months. Results: One hundred forty-seven patients were enrolled: 73 were in arm A (imatinib 400 mg/d), and 74 were in arm B (imatinib 600 mg/d). Response rates, median progression-free survival, and median overall survival were essentially identical on both arms, and median survival was 57 months for all patients. Forty-one patients overall (28%) remained on the drug long-term. Female sex, the presence of an exon 11 mutation, and normal albumin and neutrophil levels were independently associated with better survival. Conclusion: Nearly 50% of patients with advanced GIST who were treated with imatinib mesylate survived for more than 5 years, regardless of a 400 or 600 mg/d starting dose.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2007.13.4403

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 996

Metadata

Authors
Blanke, C. D., Demetri, G. D., von Mehren, M., Heinrich, M. C., Eisenberg, B., Fletcher, J. A., Corless, C. L., Fletcher, C. D. M., Roberts, P. J., Heinz, D., Wehre, E., Nikolova, Z., & Joensuu, H.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2008-02-01
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
620-625
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2115504770
Cited by
996
References
1
FWCI
65.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Results From a Randomized Phase II Trial of Standard- Versus Higher-Dose Imatinib Mesylate for Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Expressing KIT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2007.13.4403
The paper
Blanke, C. D., Demetri, G. D., von Mehren, M., Heinrich, M. C., Eisenberg, B., Fletcher, J. A., Corless, C. L., Fletcher, C. D. M., Roberts, P. J., Heinz, D., Wehre, E., Nikolova, Z., & Joensuu, H. (2008). Long-Term Results From a Randomized Phase II Trial of Standard- Versus Higher-Dose Imatinib Mesylate for Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Expressing KIT. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.13.4403

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.