Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 371

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lenalidomide Monotherapy in Relapsed or Refractory Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Open access
Wiernik, Peter H., Lossos, Izidore S., Tuscano, Joseph M., Justice, Glen, Vose, Julie M., Cole, Craig E., Lam, Wendy, McBride, Kyle, Wride, Kenton, Pietronigro, Dennis, Takeshita, Kenichi, Ervin-Haynes, Annette, Zeldis, Jerome B., Habermann, Thomas M.·2008·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The major cause of death in aggressive lymphoma is relapse or nonresponse to initial therapy. Lenalidomide has activity in a variety of hematologic malignancies, including non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). We report the results of a phase II, single-arm, multicenter trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide oral monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive NHL. Patients and Methods: Patients were treated with oral lenalidomide 25 mg once daily on days 1 to 21, every 28 days, for 52 weeks, until disease progression or intolerance. The primary end point was response; secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Results: Forty-nine patients with a median age of 65 years received lenalidomide in this study. The most common histology was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (53%), and patients had received a median of four prior treatment regimens for NHL. An objective response rate of 35% was observed in 49 treated patients, including a 12% rate of complete response/unconfirmed complete response. Responses were observed in each aggressive histologic subtype tested (diffuse large B-cell, follicular center grade 3, mantle cell, and transformed lymphomas). Of patients with stable disease or partial response at first assessment, 25% improved with continued treatment. Estimated median duration of response was 6.2 months, and median PFS was 4.0 months. The most common grade 4 adverse events were neutropenia (8.2%) and thrombocytopenia (8.2%); the most common grade 3 adverse events were neutropenia (24.5%), leukopenia (14.3%), and thrombocytopenia (12.2%). Conclusion: Oral lenalidomide monotherapy is active in relapsed or refractory aggressive NHL, with manageable side effects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2007.15.3429

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 371

Metadata

Authors
Wiernik, P. H., Lossos, I. S., Tuscano, J. M., Justice, G., Vose, J. M., Cole, C. E., Lam, W., McBride, K., Wride, K., Pietronigro, D., Takeshita, K., Ervin-Haynes, A., Zeldis, J. B., & Habermann, T. M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2008-10-20
Volume
26
Issue
30
Pages
4952-4957
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2153558008
Cited by
371
References
1
FWCI
18.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lenalidomide Monotherapy in Relapsed or Refractory Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2007.15.3429
The paper
Wiernik, P. H., Lossos, I. S., Tuscano, J. M., Justice, G., Vose, J. M., Cole, C. E., Lam, W., McBride, K., Wride, K., Pietronigro, D., Takeshita, K., Ervin-Haynes, A., Zeldis, J. B., & Habermann, T. M. (2008). Lenalidomide Monotherapy in Relapsed or Refractory Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.15.3429

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.