The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preoperative Therapy in Invasive Breast Cancer: Pathologic Assessment and Systemic Therapy Issues in Operable Disease
Abstract
Purpose: To review the state of the science with respect to preoperative systemic therapy and pathologic assessment in operable breast cancer. Methods: This article reviews data presented at the National Cancer Institute State of the Science Conference on Preoperative Therapy in Invasive Breast Cancer as well as supporting published data. Results: Preoperative chemotherapy in operable breast cancer has been shown to improve breast conservation rates as a result of tumor response to therapy. When patients are given preoperative systemic therapy, regimens should be the same as those established as safe and active in the adjuvant setting. At present, there are no data to suggest that systemic treatment should be tailored based on initial tumor response, or based on the extent of residual disease. In operable breast cancer, there seems to be no survival advantage from initiation of systemic therapy before surgery. A variety of clinical, imaging, and pathologic measurements are available to gauge tumor response to treatment. There is a clear correlation between tumor response in the breast and lymph nodes and both disease-free and overall survival. Pathologic complete response and other pathologic measures may be useful as surrogate end points in evaluating and understanding new therapies. Conclusion: In operable breast cancer, preoperative systemic therapy is effective and can improve breast conservation rates. Unless the tumor is large or the patient is in a clinical trial, postoperative adjuvant systemic therapy is the standard of care. To achieve optimal outcomes, preoperative systemic therapy must be administered as part of a coordinated, multimodality treatment program. The preoperative setting provides a unique opportunity to study the impact of systemic therapies on breast cancer biology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Jiralerspong, S., Palla, S. L., Giordano, S. H., Meric-Bernstam, F., Liedtke, C., Barnett, C. M., Hsu, L., Hung, M.-C., Hortobagyi, G. N., & Gonzalez-Angulo, A. M. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.19.6410 · Cited by 880
Esserman, L. J., Berry, D. A., DeMichele, A., Carey, L., Davis, S. E., Buxton, M., Hudis, C., Gray, J. W., Perou, C., Yau, C., et al. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.39.2779 · Cited by 438
Self-citationResponse to neoadjuvant therapy with cisplatin in BRCA1-positive breast cancer patients
Byrski, T., Huzarski, T., Dent, R., Gronwald, J., Zuziak, D., Cybulski, C., Kladny, J., Gorski, B., Lubinski, J., & Narod, S. A. (2009) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-008-0128-9 · Cited by 340
von Minckwitz, G., Untch, M., Nüesch, E., Loibl, S., Kaufmann, M., Kümmel, S., Fasching, P. A., Eiermann, W., Blohmer, J.-U., Costa, S. D., et al. (2011) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-010-1228-x · Cited by 280
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gralow, J. R., Burstein, H. J., Wood, W., Hortobagyi, G. N., Gianni, L., von Minckwitz, G., Buzdar, A. U., Smith, I. E., Symmans, W. F., Singh, B., & Winer, E. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2008-02-10
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 814-819
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2118804515
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preoperative Therapy in Invasive Breast Cancer: Pathologic Assessment and Systemic Therapy Issues in Operable Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2007.15.3510
- The paper
- Gralow, J. R., Burstein, H. J., Wood, W., Hortobagyi, G. N., Gianni, L., von Minckwitz, G., Buzdar, A. U., Smith, I. E., Symmans, W. F., Singh, B., & Winer, E. P. (2008). Preoperative Therapy in Invasive Breast Cancer: Pathologic Assessment and Systemic Therapy Issues in Operable Disease. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.15.3510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.