The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feasibility of Screening for Lynch Syndrome Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Identifying individuals with Lynch syndrome (LS) is highly beneficial. However, it is unclear whether microsatellite instability (MSI) or immunohistochemistry (IHC) should be used as the screening test and whether screening should target all patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) or those in high-risk subgroups. Patients and Methods: MSI testing and IHC for the four mismatch repair proteins was performed on 500 tumors from unselected patients with CRC. If either MSI or IHC was abnormal, complete mutation analysis for the mismatch repair genes was performed. Results: Among the 500 patients, 18 patients (3.6%) had LS. All 18 patients detected with LS (100%) had MSI-high tumors; 17 (94%) of 18 patients with LS were correctly predicted by IHC. Of the 18 probands, only eight patients (44%) were diagnosed at age younger than 50 years, and only 13 patients (72%) met the revised Bethesda guidelines. When these results were added to data on 1,066 previously studied patients, the entire study cohort (N = 1,566) showed an overall prevalence of 44 of 1,566 patients (2.8%; 95% CI, 2.1% to 3.8%) for LS. For each proband, on average, three additional family members carried MMR mutations. Conclusion: One of every 35 patients with CRC has LS, and each has at least three relatives with LS; all of whom can benefit from increased cancer surveillance. For screening, IHC is almost equally sensitive as MSI, but IHC is more readily available and helps to direct gene testing. Limiting tumor analysis to patients who fulfill Bethesda criteria would fail to identify 28% (or one in four) cases of LS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values
Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (1994) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6947.102 · Cited by 1,711
The Family History — More Important Than Ever
Guttmacher, A. E., Collins, F. S., & Carmona, R. H. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsb042979 · Cited by 497
Cited by
Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer
Boland, C. R., & Goel, A. (2010) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2009.12.064 · Cited by 2,456
Syngal, S., Brand, R. E., Church, J. M., Giardiello, F. M., Hampel, H. L., & Burt, R. W. (2015) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2014.435 · Cited by 1,662
Self-citationHereditary and Familial Colon Cancer
Jasperson, K. W., Tuohy, T. M., Neklason, D. W., & Burt, R. W. (2010) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2010.01.054 · Cited by 1,312
Epigenetic Alterations in Colorectal Cancer: Emerging Biomarkers
Okugawa, Y., Grady, W. M., & Goel, A. (2015) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.07.011 · Cited by 782
Vasen, H. F. A., Blanco, I., Aktan-Collan, K., Gopie, J. P., Alonso, A., Aretz, S., Bernstein, I., Bertario, L., Burn, J., Capella, G., et al. (2013) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304356 · Cited by 746
Metadata
- Authors
- Hampel, H., Frankel, W. L., Martin, E., Arnold, M., Khanduja, K., Kuebler, P., Clendenning, M., Sotamaa, K., Prior, T., Westman, J. A., Panescu, J., Fix, D., Lockman, J., LaJeunesse, J., Comeras, I., & de la Chapelle, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2008-12-10
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 35
- Pages
- 5783-5788
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2145297551
- Cited by
- 876
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 29.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feasibility of Screening for Lynch Syndrome Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2008.17.5950
- The paper
- Hampel, H., Frankel, W. L., Martin, E., Arnold, M., Khanduja, K., Kuebler, P., Clendenning, M., Sotamaa, K., Prior, T., Westman, J. A., Panescu, J., Fix, D., Lockman, J., LaJeunesse, J., Comeras, I., & de la Chapelle, A. (2008). Feasibility of Screening for Lynch Syndrome Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.17.5950
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.