The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomized Phase II Trial of Concurrent Cisplatin-Radiotherapy With or Without Neoadjuvant Docetaxel and Cisplatin in Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: To compare the toxicities, tumor control, survival, and quality of life of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients treated with sequential neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent cisplatin-radiotherapy (CRT) or CRT alone. Patients and Methods: Previously untreated stage III to IVB NPC were randomly assigned to (1) neoadjuvant docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks for two cycles, followed by cisplatin 40 mg/m 2 /wk concurrent with radiotherapy, or (2) CRT alone. Planned accrual was 30 patients per arm to detect 20% difference of toxicities based on 95% CIs. Results: From November 2002 to November 2004, 65 eligible patients were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by CRT (n = 34) or CRT alone (n = 31). There was a high rate of grade 3/4 neutropenia (97%) but not neutropenic fever (12%) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. No significant differences in rates of acute toxicities were observed between the two arms during CRT. Dose intensities of concurrent cisplatin, late RT toxicities and quality of life scores were comparable in both arms. The 3-year progression-free survival for neoadjuvant versus control arm was 88.2% and 59.5% (hazard ratio = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.20 to 1.19; P = .12). The 3-year overall survival for neoadjuvant versus control arm was 94.1% and 67.7% (hazard ratio = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.078 to 0.73; P = .012). Conclusion: Neoadjuvant docetaxel-cisplatin followed by CRT was well tolerated with a manageable toxicity profile that allowed subsequent delivery of full-dose CRT. Preliminary results suggested a positive impact on survival. A phase III study to definitively test this neoadjuvant-concurrent strategy is warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., Haes, J. C. J. M. D., et al. (1993) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/85.5.365 · Cited by 16,005
Cited by
Peng, G., Wang, T., Yang, K.-Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, T., Li, Q., Han, J., & Wu, G. (2012) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2012.08.013 · Cited by 624
Lee, A. W., Ng, W. T., Pan, J. J., Poh, S. S., Ahn, Y. C., AlHussain, H., Corry, J., Grau, C., Grégoire, V., Harrington, K. J., et al. (2018) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2017.10.032 · Cited by 367
Pan, Y., Zhou, F., Zhang, R., & Claret, F. X. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054565 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Hui, E. P., Ma, B. B., Leung, S. F., King, A. D., Mo, F., Kam, M. K., Yu, B. K., Chiu, S. K., Kwan, W. H., Ho, R., Chan, I., Ahuja, A. T., Zee, B. C., & Chan, A. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2009-01-10
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 242-249
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2160982012
- Cited by
- 523
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Phase II Trial of Concurrent Cisplatin-Radiotherapy With or Without Neoadjuvant Docetaxel and Cisplatin in Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2008.18.1545
- The paper
- Hui, E. P., Ma, B. B., Leung, S. F., King, A. D., Mo, F., Kam, M. K., Yu, B. K., Chiu, S. K., Kwan, W. H., Ho, R., Chan, I., Ahuja, A. T., Zee, B. C., & Chan, A. T. (2009). Randomized Phase II Trial of Concurrent Cisplatin-Radiotherapy With or Without Neoadjuvant Docetaxel and Cisplatin in Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.18.1545
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.