Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 558

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Definition, Prognostic Factors, Treatment, and Response Criteria of Adult T-Cell Leukemia-Lymphoma: A Proposal From an International Consensus Meeting

Open access
Tsukasaki, Kunihiro, Hermine, Olivier, Bazarbachi, Ali, Ratner, Lee, Ramos, Juan Carlos, Harrington, William, O’Mahony, Deirdre, Janik, John E., Bittencourt, Achiléa L., Taylor, Graham P., Yamaguchi, Kazunari, Utsunomiya, Atae, Tobinai, Kensei, Watanabe, Toshiki·2009·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL) is a distinct peripheral T-lymphocytic malignancy associated with a retrovirus designated human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-1). The diversity in clinical features and prognosis of patients with this disease has led to its subclassification into the following four categories: acute, lymphoma, chronic, and smoldering types. The chronic and smoldering subtypes are considered indolent and are usually managed with watchful waiting until disease progression, analogous to the management of some patients with chronic lymphoid leukemia (CLL) or other indolent histology lymphomas. Patients with aggressive ATL generally have a poor prognosis because of multidrug resistance of malignant cells, a large tumor burden with multiorgan failure, hypercalcemia, and/or frequent infectious complications as a result of a profound T-cell immunodeficiency. Under the sponsorship of the 13th International Conference on Human Retrovirology: HTLV, a group of ATL researchers joined to form a consensus statement based on established data to define prognostic factors, clinical subclassifications, and treatment strategies. A set of response criteria specific for ATL reflecting a combination of those for lymphoma and CLL was proposed. Clinical subclassification is useful but is limited because of the diverse prognosis among each subtype. Molecular abnormalities within the host genome, such as tumor suppressor genes, may account for these diversities. A treatment strategy based on the clinical subclassification and prognostic factors is suggested, including watchful waiting approach, chemotherapy, antiviral therapy, allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (alloHSCT), and targeted therapies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2008.18.2428

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 558

Metadata

Authors
Tsukasaki, K., Hermine, O., Bazarbachi, A., Ratner, L., Ramos, J. C., Harrington, W., O’Mahony, D., Janik, J. E., Bittencourt, A. L., Taylor, G. P., Yamaguchi, K., Utsunomiya, A., Tobinai, K., & Watanabe, T.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2009-01-20
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
453-459
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2158377087
Cited by
558
References
4
FWCI
11.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Definition, Prognostic Factors, Treatment, and Response Criteria of Adult T-Cell Leukemia-Lymphoma: A Proposal From an International Consensus Meeting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2008.18.2428
The paper
Tsukasaki, K., Hermine, O., Bazarbachi, A., Ratner, L., Ramos, J. C., Harrington, W., O’Mahony, D., Janik, J. E., Bittencourt, A. L., Taylor, G. P., Yamaguchi, K., Utsunomiya, A., Tobinai, K., & Watanabe, T. (2009). Definition, Prognostic Factors, Treatment, and Response Criteria of Adult T-Cell Leukemia-Lymphoma: A Proposal From an International Consensus Meeting. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.18.2428

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.