The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trends in Mastectomy Rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: Effect of Surgical Year and Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Recent changes have occurred in the presurgical planning for breast cancer, including the introduction of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We sought to analyze the trends in mastectomy rates and the relationship to preoperative MRI and surgical year at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Patients and Methods: We identified 5,405 patients who underwent surgery between 1997 and 2006. Patients undergoing MRI were identified from a prospective database. Trends in mastectomy rate and the association of MRI with surgery type were analyzed. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the effect of surgery year and MRI on surgery type, while adjusting for potential confounding variables. Results: Mastectomy rates differed significantly across time (P < .0001), and decreased from 45% in 1997% to 31% in 2003, followed by increasing rates for 2004 to 2006. The use of MRI increased from 10% in 2003% to 23% in 2006 (P < .0001). Patients with MRI were more likely to undergo mastectomy than those without MRI (54% v 36%; P < .0001). However, mastectomy rates increased from 2004 to 2006 predominantly among patients without MRI (29% in 2003% to 41% in 2006; P < .0001). In a multivariable model, both MRI (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; P < .0001) and surgical year (compared to 2003 OR: 1.4 for 2004, 1.8 for 2005, and 1.7 for 2006; P < .0001) were independent predictors of mastectomy. Conclusion: After a steady decline, mastectomy rates have increased in recent years with both surgery year and MRI as significant predictors for type of surgery. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of MRI and other factors influencing surgical planning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
American Joint Committee on Cancer (2002) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3656-4 · Cited by 6,379
Veronesi, U., Cascinelli, N., Mariani, L., Greco, M., Saccozzi, R., Luini, A., Aguilar, M., & Marubini, E. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa020989 · Cited by 4,450
American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography
Saslow, D., Boetes, C., Burke, W., Harms, S., Leach, M. O., Lehman, C. D., Morris, E., Pisano, E., Schnall, M., Sener, S., et al. (2007) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.57.2.75 · Cited by 2,637
Berg, W. A., Gutierrez, L., NessAiver, M. S., Carter, W. B., Bhargavan, M., Lewis, R. S., & Ioffe, O. B. (2004) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2333031484 · Cited by 1,439
Efficacy of Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Women with a Family History of Breast Cancer
Hartmann, L. C., Schaid, D. J., Woods, J. E., Crotty, T. P., Myers, J. L., Arnold, P. G., Petty, P. M., Sellers, T. A., Johnson, J. L., McDonnell, S. K., et al. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199901143400201 · Cited by 1,423
Self-citationvan Dongen, J. A. (2000) · Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/92.14.1143 · Cited by 1,271
MRI Evaluation of the Contralateral Breast in Women with Recently Diagnosed Breast Cancer
Lehman, C. D., Gatsonis, C., Kuhl, C. K., Hendrick, R. E., Pisano, E. D., Hanna, L., Peacock, S., Smazal, S. F., Maki, D. D., Julian, T. B., et al. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa065447 · Cited by 945
Breast Carcinoma: Effect of Preoperative Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging on the Therapeutic Approach
Fischer, U., Kopka, L., & Grabbe, E. (1999) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.213.3.r99dc01881 · Cited by 664
Tuttle, T. M., Habermann, E. B., Grund, E. H., et al. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.12.3141 · Cited by 661
Cited by
Belfer, I., Schreiber, K. L., Shaffer, J. R., Shnol, H., Blaney, K., Morando, A., Englert, D., Greco, C., Brufsky, A., Ahrendt, G., et al. (2013) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2013.05.002 · Cited by 217
Schreiber, K. L., Martel, M. O., Shnol, H., Shaffer, J. R., Greco, C., Viray, N., Taylor, L. N., McLaughlin, M., Brufsky, A., Ahrendt, G., et al. (2013) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2012.11.015 · Cited by 188
Schreiber, K. L., Kehlet, H., Belfer, I., & Edwards, R. R. (2014) · Pain Management · doi:10.2217/pmt.14.33 · Cited by 106
Edmond, S. N., Shelby, R. A., Keefe, F. J., Fisher, H. M., Schmidt, J. E., Soo, M. S., Skinner, C. S., Ahrendt, G. M., Manculich, J., Sumkin, J. H., et al. (2017) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0000000000000377 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Katipamula, R., Degnim, A. C., Hoskin, T., Boughey, J. C., Loprinzi, C., Grant, C. S., Brandt, K. R., Pruthi, S., Chute, C. G., Olson, J. E., Couch, F. J., Ingle, J. N., & Goetz, M. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2009-09-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 4082-4088
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2117381783
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 30.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in Mastectomy Rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: Effect of Surgical Year and Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2008.19.4225
- The paper
- Katipamula, R., Degnim, A. C., Hoskin, T., Boughey, J. C., Loprinzi, C., Grant, C. S., Brandt, K. R., Pruthi, S., Chute, C. G., Olson, J. E., Couch, F. J., Ingle, J. N., & Goetz, M. P. (2009). Trends in Mastectomy Rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: Effect of Surgical Year and Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.19.4225
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
