Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 805

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multi-Institutional Phase I/II Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Liver Metastases

Rusthoven, Kyle E., Kavanagh, Brian D., Cardenes, Higinia, Stieber, Volker W., Burri, Stuart H., Feigenberg, Steven J., Chidel, Mark A., Pugh, Thomas J., Franklin, Wilbur, Kane, Madeleine, Gaspar, Laurie E., Schefter, Tracey E.·2009·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of high-dose stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of patients with one to three hepatic metastases. Patients and Methods: Patients with one to three hepatic lesions and maximum individual tumor diameters less than 6 cm were enrolled and treated on a multi-institutional, phase I/II clinical trial in which they received SBRT delivered in three fractions. During phase I, the total dose was safely escalated from 36 Gy to 60 Gy. The phase II dose was 60 Gy. The primary end point was local control. Lesions with at least 6 months of radiographic follow-up were considered assessable for local control. Secondary end points were toxicity and survival. Results: Forty-seven patients with 63 lesions were treated with SBRT. Among them, 69% had received at least one prior systemic therapy regimen for metastatic disease (range, 0 to 5 regimens), and 45% had extrahepatic disease at study entry. Only one patient experienced grade 3 or higher toxicity (2%). Forty-nine discrete lesions were assessable for local control. Median follow-up for assessable lesions was 16 months (range, 6 to 54 months). The median maximal tumor diameter was 2.7 cm (range, 0.4 to 5.8 cm). Local progression occurred in only three lesions at a median of 7.5 months (range, 7 to 13 months) after SBRT. Actuarial in-field local control rates at one and two years after SBRT were 95% and 92%, respectively. Among lesions with maximal diameter of 3 cm or less, 2-year local control was 100%. Median survival was 20.5 months. Conclusion: This multi-institutional, phase I/II trial demonstrates that high-dose liver SBRT is safe and effective for the treatment of patients with one to three hepatic metastases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2008.19.6329

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 805

Metadata

Authors
Rusthoven, K. E., Kavanagh, B. D., Cardenes, H., Stieber, V. W., Burri, S. H., Feigenberg, S. J., Chidel, M. A., Pugh, T. J., Franklin, W., Kane, M., Gaspar, L. E., & Schefter, T. E.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2009-04-01
Volume
27
Issue
10
Pages
1572-1578
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W4239112513
Cited by
805
References
2
FWCI
44.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-Institutional Phase I/II Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Liver Metastases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2008.19.6329
The paper
Rusthoven, K. E., Kavanagh, B. D., Cardenes, H., Stieber, V. W., Burri, S. H., Feigenberg, S. J., Chidel, M. A., Pugh, T. J., Franklin, W., Kane, M., Gaspar, L. E., & Schefter, T. E. (2009). Multi-Institutional Phase I/II Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Liver Metastases. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.19.6329

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.