The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk of Relapse of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Is Predicted By Flow Cytometric Measurement of Residual Disease on Day 15 Bone Marrow
Abstract
Purpose: Speed of blast clearance is an indicator of outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Availability of measurement of minimal residual disease (MRD) at an early time point with a reduced-cost method is of clinical relevance. In the AIEOP-BFM-ALL (Associazione Italiana Ematologia Oncologia Pediatrica and Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster Study Group) 2000 trial, patients were stratified by levels of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) MRD at day +33 and +78. AIEOP studied the prognostic impact of MRD measured by flow cytometry (FCM) at day 15 of induction therapy. Patients and Methods: Bone marrow samples from 830 Italian patients were collected on day 15, after 14 days of steroids, and one dose of intrathecal methotrexate, vincristine, daunorubicine, and asparaginase. Cells were analyzed by four-color FCM for detection of leukemia-associated immunophenotypes. Results: Three patient risk groups were identified by FCM: standard (< 0.1% blast cells; 42% of the total), intermediate (0.1 to < 10%; 47%), and high (≥ 10%; 11%). Their 5-year cumulative incidences of relapse were 7.5% (SE, 1.5), 17.5% (SE, 2.1), and 47.2% (SE, 5.9), respectively. In multivariate analysis, FCM was the most important prognostic factor among those available by day 15, with two-fold and five-fold increase in the risk of relapse compared with patients with less than 0.1%. PCR MRD, when added to the model, had significant prognostic impact; yet high levels of FCM MRD retained an independent ability to detect a significantly higher risk of relapse. Conclusion: Measurement of FCM MRD in day 15 bone marrow was the most powerful early predictor of relapse, applicable to virtually all patients; it may complement PCR MRD–based stratification including later time points, thus allowing additional treatment tailoring.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Inaba, H., Greaves, M., & Mullighan, C. G. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)62187-4 · Cited by 1,074
Theunissen, P., Mejstrikova, E., Sedek, L., van der Sluijs-Gelling, A. J., Gaipa, G., Bartels, M., Sobral da Costa, E., Kotrová, M., Novakova, M., Sonneveld, E., et al. (2017) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2016-07-726307 · Cited by 435
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Basso, G., Veltroni, M., Valsecchi, M. G., Dworzak, M. N., Ratei, R., Silvestri, D., Benetello, A., Buldini, B., Maglia, O., Masera, G., Conter, V., Arico, M., Biondi, A., & Gaipa, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2009-11-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 31
- Pages
- 5168-5174
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2105608321
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk of Relapse of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Is Predicted By Flow Cytometric Measurement of Residual Disease on Day 15 Bone Marrow. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2008.20.8934
- The paper
- Basso, G., Veltroni, M., Valsecchi, M. G., Dworzak, M. N., Ratei, R., Silvestri, D., Benetello, A., Buldini, B., Maglia, O., Masera, G., Conter, V., Arico, M., Biondi, A., & Gaipa, G. (2009). Risk of Relapse of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Is Predicted By Flow Cytometric Measurement of Residual Disease on Day 15 Bone Marrow. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.20.8934
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.