The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phase III Study of Bevacizumab Plus Docetaxel Compared With Placebo Plus Docetaxel for the First-Line Treatment of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer
Abstract
Purpose: The efficacy and safety of combining bevacizumab (7.5 and 15 mg/kg) with docetaxel as first-line therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) was investigated in a three-arm, placebo-controlled, phase III trial. Patients and Methods: Patients (N = 736) were randomly assigned to docetaxel 100 mg/m 2 plus either placebo or bevacizumab 7.5 or 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points included best overall response, duration of response, time to treatment failure, overall survival, and safety. Results: Combination of bevacizumab 15 mg/kg, but not 7.5 mg/kg, with docetaxel showed superior median PFS (mPFS) to placebo plus docetaxel in unstratified analysis (placebo mPFS, 8.2 months; 7.5 mg/kg mPFS, 9.0 months [hazard ratio (HR), 0.86; P = .12]; 15 mg/kg mPFS, 10.1 months [HR, 0.77; P = .006]) and stratified analysis (placebo mPFS, 8.1 months; 7.5 mg/kg mPFS, 9.0 months [HR, 0.80; P = .045]; 15 mg/kg mPFS, 10.0 months [HR, 0.67; P < .001]). Response rates in patients with measurable disease at baseline also increased with bevacizumab 15 mg/kg (46% [placebo] v 55% [7.5 mg/kg; P = .07] and 64% [15 mg/kg; P < .001]). Combination with bevacizumab had limited impact on the known toxicity profile of docetaxel. Conclusion: Combination of bevacizumab with docetaxel did not significantly impact on the safety profile of docetaxel. Bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks significantly increased PFS when combined with docetaxel as first-line therapy for MBC compared with docetaxel plus placebo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors
Therasse, P., Arbuck, S. G., Eisenhauer, E. A., Wanders, J., Kaplan, R. S., Rubinstein, L., Verweij, J., Van Glabbeke, M., van Oosterom, A. T., Christian, M. C., et al. (2000) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/92.3.205 · Cited by 15,660
Bevacizumab plus Irinotecan, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Hurwitz, H., Fehrenbacher, L., Novotny, W., Cartwright, T., Hainsworth, J., Heim, W., Berlin, J., Baron, A., Griffing, S., Holmgren, E., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032691 · Cited by 10,968
Paclitaxel–Carboplatin Alone or with Bevacizumab for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Sandler, A., Gray, R., Perry, M. C., Brahmer, J., Schiller, J. H., Dowlati, A., Lilenbaum, R., & Johnson, D. H. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa061884 · Cited by 5,761
VEGF-targeted therapy: mechanisms of anti-tumour activity
Ellis, L. M., & Hicklin, D. J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2403 · Cited by 1,673
Cited by
Antiangiogenesis Strategies Revisited: From Starving Tumors to Alleviating Hypoxia
Jain, R. K. (2014) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2014.10.006 · Cited by 1,589
Normalizing Tumor Microenvironment to Treat Cancer: Bench to Bedside to Biomarkers
Jain, R. K. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.46.3653 · Cited by 1,248
Garcia, J., Hurwitz, H. I., Sandler, A. B., Miles, D., Coleman, R. L., Deurloo, R., & Chinot, O. L. (2020) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102017 · Cited by 1,159
Self-citationHuang, Y., Yuan, J., Righi, E., Kamoun, W. S., Ancukiewicz, M., Nezivar, J., Santosuosso, M., Martin, J. D., Martin, M. R., Vianello, F., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1215397109 · Cited by 1,099
Antiangiogenic therapy: impact on invasion, disease progression, and metastasis
Ebos, J. M. L., & Kerbel, R. S. (2011) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.21 · Cited by 685
Metadata
- Authors
- Miles, D. W., Chan, A., Dirix, L. Y., Cortés, J., Pivot, X., Tomczak, P., Delozier, T., Sohn, J. H., Provencher, L., Puglisi, F., Harbeck, N., Steger, G. G., Schneeweiss, A., Wardley, A. M., Chlistalla, A., & Romieu, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2010-07-10
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 3239-3247
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2167224460
- Cited by
- 897
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 32.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase III Study of Bevacizumab Plus Docetaxel Compared With Placebo Plus Docetaxel for the First-Line Treatment of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2008.21.6457
- The paper
- Miles, D. W., Chan, A., Dirix, L. Y., Cortés, J., Pivot, X., Tomczak, P., Delozier, T., Sohn, J. H., Provencher, L., Puglisi, F., Harbeck, N., Steger, G. G., Schneeweiss, A., Wardley, A. M., Chlistalla, A., & Romieu, G. (2010). Phase III Study of Bevacizumab Plus Docetaxel Compared With Placebo Plus Docetaxel for the First-Line Treatment of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.21.6457
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.