Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 422

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

D-Dimer and Prothrombin Fragment 1 + 2 Predict Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Cancer: Results From the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study

Ay, Cihan, Vormittag, Rainer, Dunkler, Daniela, Simanek, Ralph, Chiriac, Alexandru-Laurentiu, Drach, Johannes, Quehenberger, Peter, Wagner, Oswald, Zielinski, Christoph, Pabinger, Ingrid·2009·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-recognized complication of cancer. Laboratory parameters might be useful to assess the VTE risk in patients with cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate D-dimer and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F 1 + 2), which reflect activation of blood coagulation and fibrinolysis, for prediction of cancer-associated VTE. Patients and Methods: In a prospective, observational, cohort study of 821 patients with newly diagnosed cancer or progression of disease who did not recently receive chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery were enrolled and followed for a median of 501 days (interquartile range, 255 to 731 days). The malignancies in these patients were as follows: breast (n = 132), lung (n = 119), stomach (n = 35), lower gastrointestinal tract (n = 106), pancreas (n = 46), kidney (n = 22), and prostate (n = 101) cancers; high-grade glioma (n = 102); malignant lymphoma (n = 94); multiple myeloma (n = 17); and other tumor types (n = 47). The study end point was occurrence of objectively confirmed symptomatic or fatal VTE. Results: VTE occurred in 62 patients (7.6%). The cutoff level for elevated D-dimer and elevated F 1 + 2 was set at the 75th percentile of the total study population. In multivariable analysis that included elevated D-dimer, elevated F 1 + 2, age, sex, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, the hazard ratios (HRs) of VTE in patients with elevated D-dimer (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.0 to 3.2; P = .048) and elevated F 1 + 2 (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2 to 3.6; P = .015) were statistically significantly increased. The cumulative probability of developing VTE after 6 months was highest in patients with both elevated D-dimer and elevated F 1 + 2 (15.2%) compared with patients with nonelevated D-dimer and nonelevated F 1 + 2 (5.0%; P < .001). Conclusion: High D-dimer and F 1 + 2 levels independently predict occurrence of VTE in patients with cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2008.21.7752

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 422

Metadata

Authors
Ay, C., Vormittag, R., Dunkler, D., Simanek, R., Chiriac, A.-L., Drach, J., Quehenberger, P., Wagner, O., Zielinski, C., & Pabinger, I.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2009-09-01
Volume
27
Issue
25
Pages
4124-4129
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2013996375
Cited by
422
References
1
FWCI
16.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: D-Dimer and Prothrombin Fragment 1 + 2 Predict Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Cancer: Results From the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2008.21.7752
The paper
Ay, C., Vormittag, R., Dunkler, D., Simanek, R., Chiriac, A.-L., Drach, J., Quehenberger, P., Wagner, O., Zielinski, C., & Pabinger, I. (2009). D-Dimer and Prothrombin Fragment 1 + 2 Predict Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Cancer: Results From the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.21.7752

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.