Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

TBCRC 001: EGFR inhibition with cetuximab added to carboplatin in metastatic triple-negative (basal-like) breast cancer

Carey, L. A., Rugo, H. S., Marcom, P. K., Irvin, W., Ferraro, M., Burrows, E., He, X., Perou, C. M., Winer, E. P.·2008·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

1009 Background: Basal-like breast cancer (BBC) has low expression of ER, PR, and HER2, and is thus often called triple negative (TN). Preclinical studies suggest that BBC depend on EGFR/HER1 for proliferation. TBCRC 001 is a multicenter randomized phase II study of cetuximab (C) alone and combined with carboplatin (P) in TN metastatic BrCa (MBC). Methods: Eligibility required measurable disease, ≤ 3 prior chemotherapy, no prior platinum or EGFR inhibitor. Patients (pts) in Arm 1 received C alone (400 mg/m2, then 250 mg/m2 weekly) with P (AUC 2, 3 of 4 weeks) added upon progression (PD). Pts in Arm 2 received C+P throughout. Primary endpoint was objective response (RR, CR+PR). Results: 102 TN patients were enrolled; Arm 1 = 31 pts (closed in 3/07), Arm 2 = 71 (closed 10/07). Mean age 51, 68% white, 26% African American. 87% received prior adjuvant chemo, 54% prior chemo for MBC (24% > 1 prior). Arm 1: PR 6% (2 pts, > 40 weeks), stable disease (SD) 4%, and clinical benefit (CB=PR or SD > 6mos) 10%. Arm 2: RR 18% (13 pts), SD 9% (6), and CB 27% (19). PR did not appear to differ by line of therapy: 14% 1st-line, 31% 2nd-line, 17% 3rd-line. Most pts progressed rapidly; median PFS was 2.0 months. The regimen was tolerable, grade 3 toxicity occurring in > 5% pts were: Arm 1 - rash only (10% pts); Arm 2 - rash (6%), fatigue (6%), and N/V (6%). Two grade 4 infusion reactions occurred in Arm 2. Biopsies from 16 mets confirmed subtype: basal-like (13), claudin-low (2), HER2+/ER- (1). Preliminary pharmacodynamics on paired biopsies (before/after 1–2 weeks therapy) in 9 pts reveal that 7 had gene expression evidence of activity across the EGFR pathway: 2 decreased with treatment (1PR, 1SD); 5 had no change or increased activity with treatment (1SD, 4 PD). Final response rates and further correlative endpoints will be presented. Conclusions: C alone was well tolerated but has low activity in TN MBC. C+P has 18% RR and 27% CB. Many pts progressed rapidly, consistent with the aggressive behavior of this tumor subtype. Serial biopsies offer insight into EGFR pathway modulation by therapy. Translational studies confirming molecular subtype, identifying biologic effects of EGFR inhibition and platinum, evaluating circulating tumor cells, and studying the BRCA1 pathway are ongoing. Author Disclosure Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Role Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Expert Testimony Other Remuneration Bristol-Myers Squibb

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.1009

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 163

Metadata

Authors
Carey, L. A., Rugo, H. S., Marcom, P. K., Irvin, W., Ferraro, M., Burrows, E., He, X., Perou, C. M., & Winer, E. P.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2008-05-20
Volume
26
Issue
15_suppl
Pages
1009-1009
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1812227581
Cited by
163
References
0
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TBCRC 001: EGFR inhibition with cetuximab added to carboplatin in metastatic triple-negative (basal-like) breast cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.1009
The paper
Carey, L. A., Rugo, H. S., Marcom, P. K., Irvin, W., Ferraro, M., Burrows, E., He, X., Perou, C. M., & Winer, E. P. (2008). TBCRC 001: EGFR inhibition with cetuximab added to carboplatin in metastatic triple-negative (basal-like) breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.1009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.