Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 342

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phase II Trial of Concurrent Radiation and Weekly Cisplatin Followed by VIPD Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed, Stage IE to IIE, Nasal, Extranodal NK/T-Cell Lymphoma: Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma Study

Open access
Kim, Seok Jin, Kim, Kihyun, Kim, Byung Soo, Kim, Chul Yong, Suh, Cheolwon, Huh, Jooryung, Lee, Sang-Wook, Kim, Jin Seok, Cho, Jaeho, Lee, Gyeong-Won, Kang, Ki Mun, Eom, Hyeon Seok, Pyo, Hong Ryull, Ahn, Yong Chan, Ko, Young Hyeh, Kim, Won Seog·2009·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: On the basis of the benefits of frontline radiation in early-stage, extranodal, natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL), we conducted a phase II trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by three cycles of etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin, and dexamethasone (VIPD). Patients and Methods: Thirty patients with newly diagnosed, stages IE to IIE, nasal ENKTL received CCRT (ie radiation 40 to 52.8 Gy and cisplatin 30 mg/m 2 weekly). Three cycles of VIPD (etoposide 100 mg/m 2 days 1 through 3, ifosfamide 1,200 mg/m 2 days 1 through 3, cisplatin 33 mg/m 2 days 1 through 3, and dexamethasone 40 mg days 1 through 4) were scheduled after CCRT. Results: All patients completed CCRT, which resulted in 100% response that included 22 complete responses (CRs) and eight partial responses (PRs). The CR rate after CCRT was 73.3% (ie, 22 of 30 responses; 95% CI, 57.46 to 89.13). Twenty-six of 30 patients completed the planned three cycles of VIPD, whereas four patients did not because they withdrew (n = 2) or because they had an infection (n = 2). The overall response rate and the CR rate were 83.3% (ie; 25 of 30 responses; 95% CI, 65.28 to 94.36) and 80.0% (ie, 24 of 30 responses; 95% CI, 65.69 to 94.31), respectively. Only one patient experienced grade 3 toxicity during CCRT (nausea), whereas 12 of 29 patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia. The estimated 3-year, progression-free and overall survival rates were 85.19% (95% CI, 72.48 to 97.90) and 86.28% (95% CI, 73.97 to 98.59), respectively. Conclusion: Patients with newly diagnosed, stages IE to IIE, nasal ENKTL are best treated with frontline CCRT.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2009.23.8592

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 342

Metadata

Authors
Kim, S. J., Kim, K., Kim, B. S., Kim, C. Y., Suh, C., Huh, J., Lee, S.-W., Kim, J. S., Cho, J., Lee, G.-W., Kang, K. M., Eom, H. S., Pyo, H. R., Ahn, Y. C., Ko, Y. H., & Kim, W. S.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2009-12-10
Volume
27
Issue
35
Pages
6027-6032
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2154269623
Cited by
342
References
5
FWCI
12.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase II Trial of Concurrent Radiation and Weekly Cisplatin Followed by VIPD Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed, Stage IE to IIE, Nasal, Extranodal NK/T-Cell Lymphoma: Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2009.23.8592
The paper
Kim, S. J., Kim, K., Kim, B. S., Kim, C. Y., Suh, C., Huh, J., Lee, S.-W., Kim, J. S., Cho, J., Lee, G.-W., Kang, K. M., Eom, H. S., Pyo, H. R., Ahn, Y. C., Ko, Y. H., & Kim, W. S. (2009). Phase II Trial of Concurrent Radiation and Weekly Cisplatin Followed by VIPD Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed, Stage IE to IIE, Nasal, Extranodal NK/T-Cell Lymphoma: Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.23.8592

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.