The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Association of BRCA1 Mutations With Occult Primary Ovarian Insufficiency: A Possible Explanation for the Link Between Infertility and Breast/Ovarian Cancer Risks
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Germline mutations in BRCA genes are associated with breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility. Because infertility is associated with breast and ovarian cancer risks, we hypothesized that the mutations in the BRCA gene may be associated with low response to fertility treatments. Methods: We performed ovarian stimulation in 126 women with breast cancer by using letrozole and gonadotropins for the purpose of fertility preservation by embryo or oocyte cryopreservation. As surrogates of ovarian reserve, the oocyte yield and the incidence of low response were compared with ovarian stimulation according to BRCA mutation status. Results: Of the 82 women who met the inclusion criteria, 47 women (57%) had undergone BRCA testing, and 14 had a mutation in BRCA genes, of which two were of clinically undetermined significance. In BRCA mutation–positive patients, low ovarian response rate was significantly higher compared with BRCA mutation–negative patients (33.3 v 3.3%; P = .014) and with BRCA-untested women (2.9%; P = .012). All BRCA mutation–positive low responders had BRCA1 mutations, but low response was not encountered in women who were only BRCA2 mutation positive. Compared with controls, BRCA1 mutation– but not BRCA2 mutation–positive women produced lower numbers of eggs (7.4 [95% CI, 3.1 to 17.7] v 12.4 [95% CI, 10.8 to 14.2]; P = .025) and had as many as 38.3 times the odds ratio of low response (95% CI, 4.1 to 353.4; P = .001). Conclusion: BRCA1 mutations are associated with occult primary ovarian insufficiency. This finding may, at least in part, explain the link between infertility and breast/ovarian cancer risks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interaction of the Fanconi Anemia Proteins and BRCA1 in a Common Pathway
Garcia-Higuera, I., Taniguchi, T., Ganesan, S., Meyn, M. S., Timmers, C., Hejna, J., Grompe, M., & D'Andrea, A. D. (2001) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00173-3 · Cited by 1,198
Cited by
The PRACTICAL Consortium, Day, F. R., kConFab Investigators, AOCS Investigators, Scotland, G., EPIC-InterAct Consortium, Study, L. C., Ruth, K. S., Thompson, D. J., Lunetta, K. L., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3412 · Cited by 402
Oocyte vitrification for fertility preservation for both medical and nonmedical reasons
Cobo, A., García-Velasco, J. A., Remohí, J., & Pellicer, A. (2021) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.02.006 · Cited by 165
Cell-Free Fat Extract Improves Ovarian Function and Fertility in Mice With Advanced Age
Liu, M., Li, W., Zhou, X., Zhou, M., Zhang, W., Liu, Q., Zhang, A., & Xu, B. (2022) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.912648 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Oktay, K., Kim, J. Y., Barad, D., & Babayev, S. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2010-01-10
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 240-244
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2151249060
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.