The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accumulation of Segmental Alterations Determines Progression in Neuroblastoma
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Neuroblastoma is characterized by two distinct types of genetic profiles, consisting of either numerical or segmental chromosome alterations. The latter are associated with a higher risk of relapse, even when occurring together with numerical alterations. We explored the role of segmental alterations in tumor progression and the possibility of evolution from indolent to aggressive genomic types. Patients and Methods: Array-based comparative genomic hybridization data of 394 neuroblastoma samples were analyzed and linked to clinical data. Results: Integration of ploidy and genomic data indicated that pseudotriploid tumors with mixed numerical and segmental profiles may be derived from pseudotriploid tumors with numerical alterations only. This was confirmed by the analysis of paired samples, at diagnosis and at relapse, as in tumors with a purely numerical profile at diagnosis additional segmental alterations at relapse were frequently observed. New segmental alterations at relapse were also seen in patients with segmental alterations at diagnosis. This was not linked to secondary effects of cytotoxic treatments since it occurred even in patients treated with surgery alone. A higher number of chromosome breakpoints were correlated with advanced age at diagnosis, advanced stage of disease, with a higher risk of relapse, and a poorer outcome. Conclusion: These data provide further evidence of the role of segmental alterations, suggesting that tumor progression is linked to the accumulation of segmental alterations in neuroblastoma. This possibility of genomic evolution should be taken into account in treatment strategies of low- and intermediate-risk neuroblastoma and should warrant biologic reinvestigation at the time of relapse.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer
Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35077232 · Cited by 3,939
Cited by
Neuroblastoma: developmental biology, cancer genomics and immunotherapy
Cheung, N.-K. V., & Dyer, M. A. (2013) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3526 · Cited by 801
Revised Neuroblastoma Risk Classification System: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group
Irwin, M. S., Naranjo, A., Zhang, F. F., Cohn, S. L., London, W. B., Gastier-Foster, J. M., Ramirez, N. C., Pfau, R., Reshmi, S., Wagner, E., et al. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.21.00278 · Cited by 494
Children's Oncology Group's 2013 blueprint for research: Neuroblastoma
Park, J. R., Bagatell, R., London, W. B., Maris, J. M., Cohn, S. L., Mattay, K. M., Hogarty, M., & on behalf of the COG Neuroblastoma Committee (2013) · Pediatric Blood & Cancer · doi:10.1002/pbc.24433 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Schleiermacher, G., Janoueix-Lerosey, I., Ribeiro, A., Klijanienko, J., Couturier, J., Pierron, G., Mosseri, V., Valent, A., Auger, N., Plantaz, D., Rubie, H., Valteau-Couanet, D., Bourdeaut, F., Combaret, V., Bergeron, C., Michon, J., & Delattre, O.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2010-07-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 3122-3130
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2149034978
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accumulation of Segmental Alterations Determines Progression in Neuroblastoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2009.26.7955
- The paper
- Schleiermacher, G., Janoueix-Lerosey, I., Ribeiro, A., Klijanienko, J., Couturier, J., Pierron, G., Mosseri, V., Valent, A., Auger, N., Plantaz, D., Rubie, H., Valteau-Couanet, D., Bourdeaut, F., Combaret, V., Bergeron, C., Michon, J., & Delattre, O. (2010). Accumulation of Segmental Alterations Determines Progression in Neuroblastoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.26.7955
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.