Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 617

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

TP53 Mutation and Survival in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Open access
Zenz, Thorsten, Eichhorst, Barbara, Busch, Raymonde, Denzel, Tina, Häbe, Sonja, Winkler, Dirk, Bühler, Andreas, Edelmann, Jennifer, Bergmann, Manuela, Hopfinger, Georg, Hensel, Manfred, Hallek, Michael, Döhner, Hartmut, Stilgenbauer, Stephan·2010·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The precise prognostic impact of TP53 mutation and its incorporation into treatment algorithms in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is unclear. We set out to define the impact of TP53 mutations in CLL. Patients and Methods: We assessed TP53 mutations by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (exons 2 to 11) in a randomized prospective trial (n = 375) with a follow-up of 52.8 months (German CLL Study Group CLL4 trial; fludarabine [F] v F + cyclophosphamide [FC]). Results: We found TP53 mutations in 8.5% of patients (28 of 328 patients). None of the patients with TP53 mutation showed a complete response. In patients with TP53 mutation, compared with patients without TP53 mutation, median progression-free survival (PFS; 23.3 v 62.2 months, respectively) and overall survival (OS; 29.2 v 84.6 months, respectively) were significantly decreased (both P < .001). TP53 mutations in the absence of 17p deletions were found in 4.5% of patients. PFS and OS for patients with 17p deletion and patients with TP53 mutation in the absence of 17p deletion were similar. Multivariate analysis identified TP53 mutation as the strongest prognostic marker regarding PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.8; P < .001) and OS (HR = 7.2; P < .001). Other independent predictors of OS were IGHV mutation status (HR = 1.9), 11q deletion (HR = 1.9), 17p deletion (HR = 2.3), and FC treatment arm (HR = 0.6). Conclusion: CLL with TP53 mutation carries a poor prognosis regardless of the presence of 17p deletion when treated with F-based chemotherapy. Thus, TP53 mutation analysis should be incorporated into the evaluation of patients with CLL before treatment initiation. Patients with TP53 mutation should be considered for alternative treatment approaches.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2009.27.8762

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 617

Metadata

Authors
Zenz, T., Eichhorst, B., Busch, R., Denzel, T., Häbe, S., Winkler, D., Bühler, A., Edelmann, J., Bergmann, M., Hopfinger, G., Hensel, M., Hallek, M., Döhner, H., & Stilgenbauer, S.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2010-10-10
Volume
28
Issue
29
Pages
4473-4479
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2113895281
Cited by
617
References
0
FWCI
18.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TP53 Mutation and Survival in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2009.27.8762
The paper
Zenz, T., Eichhorst, B., Busch, R., Denzel, T., Häbe, S., Winkler, D., Bühler, A., Edelmann, J., Bergmann, M., Hopfinger, G., Hensel, M., Hallek, M., Döhner, H., & Stilgenbauer, S. (2010). TP53 Mutation and Survival in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.27.8762

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.