The DOI matches its Crossref record.
TP53 Mutation and Survival in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The precise prognostic impact of TP53 mutation and its incorporation into treatment algorithms in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is unclear. We set out to define the impact of TP53 mutations in CLL. Patients and Methods: We assessed TP53 mutations by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (exons 2 to 11) in a randomized prospective trial (n = 375) with a follow-up of 52.8 months (German CLL Study Group CLL4 trial; fludarabine [F] v F + cyclophosphamide [FC]). Results: We found TP53 mutations in 8.5% of patients (28 of 328 patients). None of the patients with TP53 mutation showed a complete response. In patients with TP53 mutation, compared with patients without TP53 mutation, median progression-free survival (PFS; 23.3 v 62.2 months, respectively) and overall survival (OS; 29.2 v 84.6 months, respectively) were significantly decreased (both P < .001). TP53 mutations in the absence of 17p deletions were found in 4.5% of patients. PFS and OS for patients with 17p deletion and patients with TP53 mutation in the absence of 17p deletion were similar. Multivariate analysis identified TP53 mutation as the strongest prognostic marker regarding PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.8; P < .001) and OS (HR = 7.2; P < .001). Other independent predictors of OS were IGHV mutation status (HR = 1.9), 11q deletion (HR = 1.9), 17p deletion (HR = 2.3), and FC treatment arm (HR = 0.6). Conclusion: CLL with TP53 mutation carries a poor prognosis regardless of the presence of 17p deletion when treated with F-based chemotherapy. Thus, TP53 mutation analysis should be incorporated into the evaluation of patients with CLL before treatment initiation. Patients with TP53 mutation should be considered for alternative treatment approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Role of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase in B cells and malignancies
Pal Singh, S., Dammeijer, F., & Hendriks, R. W. (2018) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-018-0779-z · Cited by 726
Ali, D., Mohammad, D. K., Mujahed, H., Jonson‐Videsäter, K., Nore, B., Paul, C., & Lehmann, S. (2016) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/bjh.14036 · Cited by 49
The Drug-Induced Degradation of Oncoproteins: An Unexpected Achilles' Heel of Cancer Cells?
Ablain, J., Nasr, R., Bazarbachi, A., & de Thé, H. (2011) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-11-0087 · Cited by 44
Huun, J., Lønning, P. E., & Knappskog, S. (2017) · Cell Death Discovery · doi:10.1038/cddiscovery.2017.26 · Cited by 27
Lanasa, M. C., Davis, P. H., Datto, M., Li, Z., Gockerman, J. P., Moore, J. O., DeCastro, C. M., Friedman, D. R., Diehl, L. F., Rehder, C., et al. (2012) · Leukemia & Lymphoma · doi:10.3109/10428194.2011.610012 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Zenz, T., Eichhorst, B., Busch, R., Denzel, T., Häbe, S., Winkler, D., Bühler, A., Edelmann, J., Bergmann, M., Hopfinger, G., Hensel, M., Hallek, M., Döhner, H., & Stilgenbauer, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2010-10-10
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 4473-4479
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2113895281
- Cited by
- 617
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TP53 Mutation and Survival in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2009.27.8762
- The paper
- Zenz, T., Eichhorst, B., Busch, R., Denzel, T., Häbe, S., Winkler, D., Bühler, A., Edelmann, J., Bergmann, M., Hopfinger, G., Hensel, M., Hallek, M., Döhner, H., & Stilgenbauer, S. (2010). TP53 Mutation and Survival in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.27.8762
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.