The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prognostic Significance of p16 INK4A and Human Papillomavirus in Patients With Oropharyngeal Cancer Treated on TROG 02.02 Phase III Trial
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: To determine the prognostic importance of p16 and human papillomavirus (HPV) in patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated on a phase III concurrent chemoradiotherapy trial. Patients and Methods: Patients with stage III or IV head and neck squamous cell cancer were randomly assigned to concurrent radiotherapy and cisplatin with or without tirapazamine. In this substudy, analyses were restricted to patients with oropharyngeal cancer. p16 was detected by immunohistochemistry, and HPV was detected by in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction. Results: Slides were available for p16 assay in 206 of 465 patients, of which 185 were eligible, and p16 and HPV were evaluable in 172 patients. One hundred six (57%) of 185 were p16-positive, and in patients evaluable for both p16 and HPV, 88 (86%) of 102 p16-positive patients were also HPV-positive. Patients who were p16-positive had lower T and higher N categories and better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. p16-positive tumors compared with p16-negative tumors were associated with better 2-year overall survival (91% v 74%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.74; P = .004) and failure-free survival (87% v 72%; HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.74; P = .003). p16 was a significant prognostic factor on multivariable analysis (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.96; P = .04). p16-positive patients had lower rates of locoregional failure and deaths due to other causes. There was a trend favoring the tirapazamine arm for improved locoregional control in p16-negative patients (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.09 to 1.24; P = .13). Conclusion: HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer is a distinct entity with a favorable prognosis compared with HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancer when treated with cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lydiatt, W. M., Patel, S. G., O'Sullivan, B., Brandwein, M. S., Ridge, J. A., Migliacci, J. C., Loomis, A. M., & Shah, J. P. (2017) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21389 · Cited by 1,625
Self-citationLorch, J. H., Goloubeva, O., Haddad, R. I., Cullen, K., Sarlis, N., Tishler, R., Tan, M., Fasciano, J., Sammartino, D. E., & Posner, M. R. (2011) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70279-5 · Cited by 448
Enhanced Radiation Sensitivity in HPV-Positive Head and Neck Cancer
Kimple, R. J., Smith, M. A., Blitzer, G. C., Torres, A. D., Martin, J. A., Yang, R. Z., Peet, C. R., Lorenz, L. D., Nickel, K. P., Klingelhutz, A. J., et al. (2013) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-13-0587 · Cited by 366
Emerging biomarkers in head and neck cancer in the era of genomics
Kang, H., Kiess, A., & Chung, C. H. (2015) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.192 · Cited by 310
Gillison, M. L., Alemany, L., Snijders, P. J. F., Chaturvedi, A., Steinberg, B. M., Schwartz, S., & Castellsagué, X. (2012) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.05.070 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Rischin, D., Young, R. J., Fisher, R., Fox, S. B., Le, Q.-T., Peters, L. J., Solomon, B., Choi, J., O'Sullivan, B., Kenny, L. M., & McArthur, G. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2010-09-20
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 4142-4148
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2123526038
- Cited by
- 737
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 50.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Significance of p16 INK4A and Human Papillomavirus in Patients With Oropharyngeal Cancer Treated on TROG 02.02 Phase III Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2010.29.2904
- The paper
- Rischin, D., Young, R. J., Fisher, R., Fox, S. B., Le, Q.-T., Peters, L. J., Solomon, B., Choi, J., O'Sullivan, B., Kenny, L. M., & McArthur, G. A. (2010). Prognostic Significance of p16 INK4A and Human Papillomavirus in Patients With Oropharyngeal Cancer Treated on TROG 02.02 Phase III Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2010.29.2904
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.