Cited by 138Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations

Randomized, phase II study of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor inhibitor IMC-A12, with or without cetuximab, in patients with cetuximab- or panitumumab-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer

Open access
Reidy, Diane Lauren, Vakiani, Efsevia, Fakih, Marwan G., Saif, Muhammad Wasif, Hecht, Joel Randolph, Goodman-Davis, Noah, Hollywood, Ellen, Shia, Jinru +6 more·2010·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of IMC-A12, a human monoclonal antibody (mAb) that blocks insulin-like growth factor receptor-1 (IGF-1R), as monotherapy or in combination with cetuximab in patients with metastatic refractory anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mAb colorectal cancer. Methods: A randomized, phase II study was performed in which patients in arm A received IMC-A12 10 mg/kg intravenously (IV) every 2 weeks, while patients in arm B received this same dose of IMC-A12 plus cetuximab 500 mg/m 2 IV every 2 weeks. Subsequently, arm C (same combination treatment as arm B) was added to include patients who had disease control on a prior anti-EGFR mAb and wild-type KRAS tumors. Archived pretreatment tumor tissue was obtained when possible for KRAS, PIK3CA, and BRAF genotyping, and immunohistochemistry was obtained for pAKT as well as IGF-1R. Results: Overall, 64 patients were treated (median age, 61 years; range, 40 to 84 years): 23 patients in arm A, 21 in arm B, and 20 in arm C. No antitumor activity was seen in the 23 patients treated with IMC-A12 monotherapy. Of the 21 patients randomly assigned to IMC-A12 plus cetuximab, one patient (with KRAS wild type) achieved a partial response, with disease control lasting 6.5 months. Arm C (all patients with KRAS wild type), however, showed no additional antitumor activity. Serious adverse events thought possibly related to IMC-A12 included a grade 2 infusion-related reaction (2%; one of 64 patients), thrombocytopenia (2%; one of 64 patients), grade 3 hyperglycemia (2%; one of 64 patients), and grade 1 pyrexia (2%, one of 64 patients). Conclusion: IMC-A12 alone or in combination with cetuximab was insufficient to warrant additional study in patients with colorectal cancer refractory to EGFR inhibitors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2010.30.4154

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies combining cetuximab with anti-IGF-1R therapies have not yet yielded favorable clinical outcomes that would be consistent with this approach overcoming acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy.

    “Studies combining cetuximab with anti-IGF-1R therapies [54,55] have not yet yielded favorable clinical outcomes that would be consistent with this approach overcoming acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy.”
  • IGF-1R inhibitor IMC-A12, dalotuzumab and ganitumab did not induce effective ORR and improved median-OS in mCRC.

    “Unfortunately, IGF-1R inhibitor IMC-A12 [70], dalotuzumab (MK-0646) [71] and ganitumab [72] did not induce effective ORR and improved median-OS in mCRC.”
  • The combination of cetuximab and dalotuzumab or IMC-A12 did not improve the survival of metastatic colorectal cancer resistant to cetuximab.

    “Disappointingly, a trial showed that the combination of cetuximab and dalotuzumab or IMC-A12 did not improve the survival of mCRC resistant to cetuximab [35, 36].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 138

Authors
Reidy, D. L., Vakiani, E., Fakih, M. G., Saif, M. W., Hecht, J. R., Goodman-Davis, N., Hollywood, E., Shia, J., Schwartz, J., Chandrawansa, K., Dontabhaktuni, A., Youssoufian, H., Solit, D. B., & Saltz, L. B.
Affiliations
  • From the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; and ImClone Systems, Branchburg, NJ.
  • Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2010-09-20
Volume
28
Issue
27
Pages
4240-4246
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2105133185
Cited by
138
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 20
FWCI
10.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • Genentech
  • Chugai Pharmaceutical
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Keywords
IGF1R inhibitors, cetuximab, metastatic colorectal cancer, anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, KRAS wild-type, combination therapy, pAKT, PIK3CA, BRAF, drug safety, anticancer activity, hyperglycemia, thrombocytopenia
MeSH terms
Cetuximab, Panitumumab, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Phosphorylation, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Time Factors, United States, Colorectal Neoplasms, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Treatment Outcome, Receptor, IGF Type 1, Disease-Free Survival, ras Proteins, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review