Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phase III Randomized Study Comparing Docetaxel Plus Trastuzumab With Vinorelbine Plus Trastuzumab As First-Line Therapy of Metastatic or Locally Advanced Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Breast Cancer: The HERNATA Study

Andersson, Michael, Lidbrink, Elisabeth, Bjerre, Karsten, Wist, Erik, Enevoldsen, Kristin, Jensen, Anders B., Karlsson, Per, Tange, Ulla B., Sørensen, Peter G., Møller, Susanne, Bergh, Jonas, Langkjer, Sven T.·2011·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate docetaxel or vinorelbine, both with trastuzumab, as first-line therapy of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive advanced breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Patients naive to chemotherapy for advanced disease were randomly assigned to docetaxel 100 mg/m 2 day 1 or vinorelbine 30 to 35 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8, both combined with trastuzumab (8-mg/kg loading dose and 6-mg/kg maintenance dose) on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP). Results: A total of 143 patients were randomly allocated to docetaxel, and 141 patients were assigned to vinorelbine. The median TTP for docetaxel and vinorelbine respectively was 12.4 months versus 15.3 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.25; P = .67), median overall survival was 35.7 months versus 38.8 months (HR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.42; P = .98), and the 1-year survival rate was 88% in both arms. Median time to treatment failure for study chemotherapy was 5.6 months versus 7.7 months (HR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.64; P < .0001). The investigator-assessed overall response rate among 241 patients with measurable disease were 59.3% in both arms. More patients in the docetaxel arm discontinued therapy due to toxicity (P < .001). Significantly more treatment-related grade 3 to 4 febrile neutropenia (36.0% v 10.1%), leucopenia (40.3% v 21.0%), infection 25.1% v 13.0%), fever (4.3% v 0%), neuropathy (30.9% v 3.6%), nail changes (7.9% v 0.7%), and edema (6.5% v 0%) were reported with docetaxel. Conclusion: The study failed to demonstrate superiority of any drug in terms of efficacy, but the vinorelbine combination had significantly fewer adverse effects and should be considered as an alternative first-line option.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2010.30.8213

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Andersson, M., Lidbrink, E., Bjerre, K., Wist, E., Enevoldsen, K., Jensen, A. B., Karlsson, P., Tange, U. B., Sørensen, P. G., Møller, S., Bergh, J., & Langkjer, S. T.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2011-01-20
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
264-271
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2127457632
Cited by
294
References
3
FWCI
9.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase III Randomized Study Comparing Docetaxel Plus Trastuzumab With Vinorelbine Plus Trastuzumab As First-Line Therapy of Metastatic or Locally Advanced Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Breast Cancer: The HERNATA Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2010.30.8213
The paper
Andersson, M., Lidbrink, E., Bjerre, K., Wist, E., Enevoldsen, K., Jensen, A. B., Karlsson, P., Tange, U. B., Sørensen, P. G., Møller, S., Bergh, J., & Langkjer, S. T. (2011). Phase III Randomized Study Comparing Docetaxel Plus Trastuzumab With Vinorelbine Plus Trastuzumab As First-Line Therapy of Metastatic or Locally Advanced Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Breast Cancer: The HERNATA Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2010.30.8213

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.