Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 245

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A randomized phase III study of iniparib (BSI-201) in combination with gemcitabine/carboplatin (G/C) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

O'Shaughnessy, J., Schwartzberg, L. S., Danso, M. A., Rugo, H. S., Miller, K., Yardley, D. A., Carlson, R. W., Finn, R. S., Charpentier, E., Freese, M., Gupta, S., Blackwood-Chirchir, A., Winer, E. P.·2011·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

1007 Background: A randomized phase II study in mTNBC suggested that iniparib (I), an anticancer agent with PARP inhibitory activity, added to GC improved overall survival (OS), without potentiating GC toxicity (O’Shaughnessy et al. NEJM 2011). This confirmatory study evaluated the safety and efficacy of GC with or without I in a similar mTNBC pt population. Methods: This randomized, open-label phase III study enrolled pts ≥18 years with mTNBC, measurable disease, and ≤2 prior cytotoxic regimens for metastatic TNBC. Pts were stratified based on having 0 vs. 1–2 prior metastatic therapies. Pts were randomized (1:1) to GC alone or GCI. G (1000 mg/m2; IV) and C (AUC 2; IV) were given on days 1 and 8, and I (5.6 mg/kg; IV) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 21 days. Upon central confirmation of disease progression on GC, crossover to GCI was permitted. Primary endpoints were OS and progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were objective response rate and safety. Results: Between July 2009 and March 2010, 519 pts were randomized. Pt characteristics were balanced between the two arms. The study did not meet the criteria for significance for co-primary endpoints of OS and PFS. Efficacy results in pts stratified by line of therapy (57% in 1st line; 43% in 2nd or 3rd line) will be presented. 152 of 258 GC pts (59%) crossed over to receive GCI following disease progression. Most frequently occurring grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (53% [GC] vs. 61% [GCI]), anemia (22% vs. 18%), thrombocytopenia (24% vs. 28%), and leukopenia (15% vs. 16%). Overall, addition of I did not significantly add to the toxicity profile of GC alone. Conclusions: Although this study demonstrated a consistent safety profile to that of the phase II study, addition of I to GC did not meet the pre-specified criteria for significance for co-primary endpoints of OS and PFS in pts with mTNBC. Analyses aimed at further elucidating these findings are ongoing (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00938652). GC (n = 258 ) GCI (n = 261) Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value* Median OS, months 11.1 11.8 0.876 (0.687−1.116) 0.284 Median PFS, months 4.1 5.1 0.794 (0.646−0.976) 0.027 * Based on 2-sided log-rank test.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.1007

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 245

Metadata

Authors
O'Shaughnessy, J., Schwartzberg, L. S., Danso, M. A., Rugo, H. S., Miller, K., Yardley, D. A., Carlson, R. W., Finn, R. S., Charpentier, E., Freese, M., Gupta, S., Blackwood-Chirchir, A., & Winer, E. P.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2011-05-20
Volume
29
Issue
15_suppl
Pages
1007-1007
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2589359420
Cited by
245
References
0
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A randomized phase III study of iniparib (BSI-201) in combination with gemcitabine/carboplatin (G/C) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.1007
The paper
O'Shaughnessy, J., Schwartzberg, L. S., Danso, M. A., Rugo, H. S., Miller, K., Yardley, D. A., Carlson, R. W., Finn, R. S., Charpentier, E., Freese, M., Gupta, S., Blackwood-Chirchir, A., & Winer, E. P. (2011). A randomized phase III study of iniparib (BSI-201) in combination with gemcitabine/carboplatin (G/C) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.1007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.